Navigation
Lundai
Lundai - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
Basic Member
Joined:
20 Apr 2015
Posts to Date: 16
View Profile
Posted: 2015-05-25 15:49:22

Dear Users & Advertisers

Its with great regret we have to report that the review left by user Lundai is malicious and fictitious in the extreme. User Lundai is none other than previously banned user, Lovestud. Veteran punters and working girls are well aware of his direct abuse of service providers. He is NOT a gentleman and we would like no association with him on any level. We shall post his details in the ladies forum and we shall ask all service providers, not see him as he is a real risk to personal safety.

The lady in question noted that Lundai/Lovestud against her very strict wishes removed the condom surreptitiously and ejaculated inside her. She is hugely distressed by his dangerous behaviour as she is fastidious about her personal hygiene and would not at any stage knowingly engage in such risky behaviour. She has opted for her safety and peace of mind to take a course of HIV prophylaxis. She is reserving her right to pursue any and all legal remedies at her disposal to ensure that he does not harm any other working girl in the same manner.

We at ESA give her our full support as we don't condone such behaviour in any way shape or form. We applaud her for her courage in standing up to this person.

Lundai/Lovestud your actions are tantamount to that of a rapist, when a woman says, "NO I don't have unprotected sex" and you then through skulduggery, force what she does not wish is called rape or sexual assault. From your past behaviour on this very platform you are no stranger to such acts. Sir you have gone too far this time, there shall be consequences.

May we as real men stand up and condemn such behaviour in the strongest terms.

Kind regards
Eddie
ESA SUPPORT


Mont. Firstly I didn't specifically mention anybody. Secondly the guy has no reason to lie, bit even of he does, I wouldn't take a chance, and that is my right.
[deleted]
[deleted] - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
Less than 40 posts
Posted: 2015-05-25 15:51:33
Edited: 2015-05-25 15:58:13

"Another legendry girl in Bryanston, V." There is only one V advertising in Bryanston.
whoremonger
whoremonger - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
Gold Member
Joined:
15 May 2015
Posts to Date: 15
View Profile
Posted: 2015-05-25 16:02:21

Popcorn Time!
[deleted]
[deleted] - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
Less than 40 posts
Posted: 2015-05-25 16:04:39

Indeed, want to see how this dude is going to worm himself out of this one!
[deleted]
[deleted] - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
More than 100 posts
Posted: 2015-05-25 16:06:09

Damn now the forum is getting good. Cancel dstv soubs
Savanna
Savanna - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
Advertiser
Joined:
11 Dec 2014
Posts to Date: 811
  View Profile  
Posted: 2015-05-25 16:13:23

Lundai as u said u received this info from another source to unless u want to reveal your source I think its best u apologise to these ladies. This may or may not be true but its not nice to ruin a girl or guys repuation unless u know for sure it is true.
Lundai
Lundai - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
Basic Member
Joined:
20 Apr 2015
Posts to Date: 17
View Profile
Posted: 2015-05-25 16:17:14

Dear Users & Advertisers

Its with great regret we have to report that the review left by user Lundai is malicious and fictitious in the extreme. User Lundai is none other than previously banned user, Lovestud. Veteran punters and working girls are well aware of his direct abuse of service providers. He is NOT a gentleman and we would like no association with him on any level. We shall post his details in the ladies forum and we shall ask all service providers, not see him as he is a real risk to personal safety.

The lady in question noted that Lundai/Lovestud against her very strict wishes removed the condom surreptitiously and ejaculated inside her. She is hugely distressed by his dangerous behaviour as she is fastidious about her personal hygiene and would not at any stage knowingly engage in such risky behaviour. She has opted for her safety and peace of mind to take a course of HIV prophylaxis. She is reserving her right to pursue any and all legal remedies at her disposal to ensure that he does not harm any other working girl in the same manner.

We at ESA give her our full support as we don't condone such behaviour in any way shape or form. We applaud her for her courage in standing up to this person.

Lundai/Lovestud your actions are tantamount to that of a rapist, when a woman says, "NO I don't have unprotected sex" and you then through skulduggery, force what she does not wish is called rape or sexual assault. From your past behaviour on this very platform you are no stranger to such acts. Sir you have gone too far this time, there shall be consequences.

May we as real men stand up and condemn such behaviour in the strongest terms.

Kind regards
Eddie
ESA SUPPORT


He has no reason to lie. He swears on it. I believe him. As I said everybody is welcome to their own opinion and to voice it.
Lundai
Lundai - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
Basic Member
Joined:
20 Apr 2015
Posts to Date: 18
View Profile
Posted: 2015-05-25 16:19:18

Dear Users & Advertisers

Its with great regret we have to report that the review left by user Lundai is malicious and fictitious in the extreme. User Lundai is none other than previously banned user, Lovestud. Veteran punters and working girls are well aware of his direct abuse of service providers. He is NOT a gentleman and we would like no association with him on any level. We shall post his details in the ladies forum and we shall ask all service providers, not see him as he is a real risk to personal safety.

The lady in question noted that Lundai/Lovestud against her very strict wishes removed the condom surreptitiously and ejaculated inside her. She is hugely distressed by his dangerous behaviour as she is fastidious about her personal hygiene and would not at any stage knowingly engage in such risky behaviour. She has opted for her safety and peace of mind to take a course of HIV prophylaxis. She is reserving her right to pursue any and all legal remedies at her disposal to ensure that he does not harm any other working girl in the same manner.

We at ESA give her our full support as we don't condone such behaviour in any way shape or form. We applaud her for her courage in standing up to this person.

Lundai/Lovestud your actions are tantamount to that of a rapist, when a woman says, "NO I don't have unprotected sex" and you then through skulduggery, force what she does not wish is called rape or sexual assault. From your past behaviour on this very platform you are no stranger to such acts. Sir you have gone too far this time, there shall be consequences.

May we as real men stand up and condemn such behaviour in the strongest terms.

Kind regards
Eddie
ESA SUPPORT


I know the girls names and wouldn't visit them. Every person has a right to see whoever they please. The risk is not worth the reward.
FW007
FW007 - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
Basic Member
Joined:
12 May 2015
Posts to Date: 17
View Profile
Posted: 2015-05-25 16:24:30

Aaa ja; i can see bussiness going quiet now. Funny not funny. lol
[deleted]
[deleted] - Re: Was who go bareback.
Re: Was who go bareback.
Less than 100 posts
Posted: 2015-05-25 16:25:29

How often do condoms break? This is really scary.

Reply

You must be logged in to post on this forum. Basic Membership is free and it only takes a minute to sign up. Alternatively, if you are already a member, please log in. You will be automatically returned to this page.

Legend


Hover mouse over icons for description

Back to Previous Page
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.