Posted: 2012-01-30 14:12:05
@esajaco... Shannon was a waste of time for me. Went for a rub 'n tug. The massage was nothing special but not too bad... a little soft for me. Then she whipped me over onto my back, grabbed my 'nana and vigorously pumped it like it was a salt-shaker. No finesse at all. Not my cuppa tea.
@pynedew... Cindy is a real pleasure. She is really comfortable with her own body and why wouldn't she be? She's in her late 20's I'd say, with a lovely, firm body (not a skeleton, but definitely no fat), perky little tits and a lovely fresh oyster. The best thing about her is her complete lack of inhibitions, which put me at ease very quickly, and her enthusiasm for what she does. Oh... and she is very reasonably priced.
Another interesting one is Tina, in Glenwood, who is young (around 18-19), small, and with a VERY tight body. She is however still very young and does not get totally into it. Not due to a bad attitude, but rather a case of not enough confidence. Anyway, I was just happy to spend the hour exploring that delightful body of hers. I'm not sure how long she will be around, be if she sticks around, she will get better over time and will then become one of the best... in my opinion.
If you are looking for a solid massage with a great ending, then give Rachael in Glenwood a call (advertises in the Mercury). She is around 30-35, with a very tidy body. Starts on a plinth with a good solid massage, and then onto the floor (with padding) where she does the whole body-slide number. You then roll onto your back and she gives you a slow, sensual, awesome, explosive ending.