Navigation
![]( "A member of ESA for less than a year")
![]( "A member of ESA between a year and five years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than five years, but less than 10 years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than 10 years")
![]( "Gold Member")
![]( "ESA staff met this punter in person")
![]( "A respected member of the community, with consistent helpful posts")
![]( "One of our Wicked Wendesday Winners")
![]( "Directly helps ESA in the recruitement of new advertisers")
![]( "Donated to Charity")
![]( "Is the owner/manager of a venue advertising on ESA")
![]( "Part of the ESA Photography Team")
![]( "Received the Punter Of the Year Award")
Hover mouse over icons for description
-
Re: How accurate is the ESA top 10??
Posted: 2020-04-04 09:35:19
Good morning
This is a bug we've never seen before simply because we've never had a month where we the system didn't receive a single vote for 4 days. Since everyone has 0 votes, the system just interprets all profiles on the exact same level.
We're busy fixing it.
Kind regards
Antionette
ESA Support
This is a bug we've never seen before simply because we've never had a month where we the system didn't receive a single vote for 4 days. Since everyone has 0 votes, the system just interprets all profiles on the exact same level.
We're busy fixing it.
Kind regards
Antionette
ESA Support
-
Re: How accurate is the ESA top 10??
Posted: 2020-04-04 09:37:49
Never say never hey...
A Y2K bug!
A Y2K bug!
-
Re: How accurate is the ESA top 10??
Posted: 2020-04-04 09:54:35
This is my understanding of how it works...
Clicks(views) per profile are counted every time a profile gets opened whether it is from a non member,basic member or GM.
Voting by GM menembers of a profile to top 10 orders those with votes first into order of highest to lowest number of clicks(views) per profile.
(these profiles are not necessarily the profiles with highest clicks (views)per profile) but reflects the popularity of a profile under GM members rather than the popularity of a profile in general. Which is extremely good for ladies that has
If there are no votes to top 10 by GM members. All profiles are then ordered from highest to lowest clicks(views) per profile.(which is a True reflection of the popularity of profiles as only the number of clicks(views) per profile counts and not the voting to 10 ten that are only possible by GM members)
Seems the banned profiles are getting attention from punters hence those profiles will end up in top 10 line up.
Sure they will find a way to have the banned profiles excluded from the system that counts clicks (views) but it is also a good indication that guys are looking at banned profiles to protect themself from maybe landing in a trap with same girl that now advertises on others sites after being banned here.
Don't think there is in a sense anything wrong with system or that it is a bug. It just works differently because of less traffic and no GM voting happening at the moment.
But as we see ESA is attending to the queries;)
Clicks(views) per profile are counted every time a profile gets opened whether it is from a non member,basic member or GM.
Voting by GM menembers of a profile to top 10 orders those with votes first into order of highest to lowest number of clicks(views) per profile.
(these profiles are not necessarily the profiles with highest clicks (views)per profile) but reflects the popularity of a profile under GM members rather than the popularity of a profile in general. Which is extremely good for ladies that has
If there are no votes to top 10 by GM members. All profiles are then ordered from highest to lowest clicks(views) per profile.(which is a True reflection of the popularity of profiles as only the number of clicks(views) per profile counts and not the voting to 10 ten that are only possible by GM members)
Seems the banned profiles are getting attention from punters hence those profiles will end up in top 10 line up.
Sure they will find a way to have the banned profiles excluded from the system that counts clicks (views) but it is also a good indication that guys are looking at banned profiles to protect themself from maybe landing in a trap with same girl that now advertises on others sites after being banned here.
Don't think there is in a sense anything wrong with system or that it is a bug. It just works differently because of less traffic and no GM voting happening at the moment.
But as we see ESA is attending to the queries;)
-
Re: How accurate is the ESA top 10??
Posted: 2020-04-04 10:09:24
Thank you for putting people at ease.
On 2020-04-04 09:35:19 ESA Forum Admin said:
Good morning
This is a bug we've never seen before simply because we've never had a month where we the system didn't receive a single vote for 4 days. Since everyone has 0 votes, the system just interprets all profiles on the exact same level.
We're busy fixing it.
Kind regards
Antionette
ESA Support
Thank you for putting people at ease.
-
Re: How accurate is the ESA top 10??
Posted: 2020-04-04 10:19:21
If there are no GM ratings, the "oldest" 10 profiles are listed as the top 10 in order of "date joined".
If two or more profiles has the same GM rating, profile will be listed based on the above principle.
The profile popularity (clicks) has zero influence on the top 10 listings.
And as "Admin" has indicated, the "system bug" takes prefrence if there is no ratings for the month.
During a normal month reset, you will notice that the same ladies always start as the top 10. All ledgends of ESA, still plying their trade.7
If two or more profiles has the same GM rating, profile will be listed based on the above principle.
The profile popularity (clicks) has zero influence on the top 10 listings.
And as "Admin" has indicated, the "system bug" takes prefrence if there is no ratings for the month.
During a normal month reset, you will notice that the same ladies always start as the top 10. All ledgends of ESA, still plying their trade.7
Reply
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.