Navigation
![]( "A member of ESA for less than a year")
![]( "A member of ESA between a year and five years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than five years, but less than 10 years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than 10 years")
![]( "Gold Member")
![]( "ESA staff met this punter in person")
![]( "A respected member of the community, with consistent helpful posts")
![]( "One of our Wicked Wendesday Winners")
![]( "Directly helps ESA in the recruitement of new advertisers")
![]( "Donated to Charity")
![]( "Is the owner/manager of a venue advertising on ESA")
![]( "Part of the ESA Photography Team")
![]( "Received the Punter Of the Year Award")
Hover mouse over icons for description
-
jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:23:40
So the above guy reviewed mienkie, jenna, Amy and camryn.
2 good reviews and 2 bad.
Is it possible to see all this ladies in a day and do you have that energy because all this babes are hotties and definitely drain you.
Ladies can you confirm if this guy visited you?
2 good reviews and 2 bad.
Is it possible to see all this ladies in a day and do you have that energy because all this babes are hotties and definitely drain you.
Ladies can you confirm if this guy visited you?
-
Re: jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:31:20
Why do you think he had seen the ladies on the same date.
"Never assume it does make an ass of u and me".
Just a question, what is wrong with his review, it is his perception.
What is your reason for questioning it.
"Never assume it does make an ass of u and me".
Just a question, what is wrong with his review, it is his perception.
What is your reason for questioning it.
-
Re: jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:33:41
If he saw the ladies weeks before why cant he state it
-
Re: jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:40:37
Joined in 2015 and took him three years to post anything? And two very respectable/popular ladies getting bad reviews and how he/she writes the reviews is a bit over the top. It does sound strange...
-
Re: jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:44:57
Why should he state it, he saw the based on the month as indicated on the review, nowhere does it as for dd:hh:mm:ss.Esa is happy with MM:yyyy only.
On 2018-11-20 11:33:41 hotbhuta said:
If he saw the ladies weeks before why cant he state it
Why should he state it, he saw the based on the month as indicated on the review, nowhere does it as for dd:hh:mm:ss.Esa is happy with MM:yyyy only.
-
Re: jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:45:47
Lol just keep quite Lea-may just bite your tongue...... Shttttttttt
-
Re: jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:51:30
You don't have a problem with post from someone that joined in 2006 and be missing for years from forum. Why do you have a problem with this guy, purely because your views are diffirent from his.
Did you attend the sessions with him, to have first hand knowledge that he has made a mistake in his reviews.
On 2018-11-20 11:40:37 Ericsie said:
Joined in 2015 and took him three years to post anything? And two very respectable/popular ladies getting bad reviews and how he/she writes the reviews is a bit over the top. It does sound strange...
You don't have a problem with post from someone that joined in 2006 and be missing for years from forum. Why do you have a problem with this guy, purely because your views are diffirent from his.
Did you attend the sessions with him, to have first hand knowledge that he has made a mistake in his reviews.
-
Re: jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:56:37
@jjsoap lol why trying so hard to defend him
-
Re: jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:57:05
Just pointed out something weird.
-
Re: jakalasie
Posted: 2018-11-20 11:59:37
And what us the weird part, that someone disagree with your views, or that he was prepared to give an honest review.
On 2018-11-20 11:57:05 hotbhuta said:
Just pointed out something weird.
And what us the weird part, that someone disagree with your views, or that he was prepared to give an honest review.
Reply
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.