Hi all,
I was wondering if perhaps ESA can list the ladies rates per hour on their profiles, similar to what Heidi fleiss does on their site.

It does not even have to be specific, a ball park figure is fine, just can be helpful when browsing for a girl to visit?

Good idea or bad idea?

I think it is a gr8 idea aardvark!!

Hi Guys

We agree it's a great idea and we understand that it would make life easier. We however don't want to discuss and/or list rates on this site.

It is a great idea, but unfortunately there could be serious legal implications for the girls if we did put our rates up.
Hope that helps as to why we dont.

Thanks

Arz

How about just advertising it as R500 - R700. That gives a punter a fair idea

Why not state that rates are for time spent with the lady and not for sex. Like some other sites do.

Might be good for punters might also be bad.

@ Arz, fair enough, so how about sending me a p.m. Of your rates please :-)

@ ESA, cool.

@ESA Admin

How about a system similar used by gsmarena and other sites used to give a relative indication of cost rather than a definitive price?

One to five roses. 1 for budget, 5 for expensive?

Publishing actual rates would act as an artificial measure in that girls charging more money would appear to be 'better' than cheaper girls.

There is a convention used in some tourist guide books that uses $ signs to denominate relative expenditure. For example a girl that charges under R600 per hour with extras would be $ whilst a girl that charges R900 plus extras would be $$.

When it comes to WG compensation, I have always found that base rate is just a starting point. This is extra, that is extra. But it would save me a lot of time if a hot chick is listed as $$$, then I know not to even bother because that girl is overcharging because she is hot. Or in reverse if she is listed as $$ there should not be any hangups.

And also, such a system should work on the basis where the punters can include the ammount paid in the review form here at esa, and the ammount is hidden from view but used to calculate the $ rating. Then, sans the possible abuse, the rating would be determined only by punters who have visited the particular WG.

Don't want the WG's putting up their own prices - can't imagine the type of price war. R500 .... R499 .... R496 ...