Do punters who give a lady 5/5 for face and compliment them on beauty understand the term beautiful. It's so disappointing when guys go crazy about a girl only to find out that some people's perception is skewed.

To some extent i agree. The ratings are just 1sand 5s. Maybe privacy gets marked down, but in general 5 for everything is the norm.

But then, one must also acknowledge that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. What i consider stunning, may just be average to you, and vice versa.

Thankfully most clients are very kind.
Just take the ratings on looks with a pinch of salt.

Most ladies that are not very beautiful are fully aware but getting constant 1 as a rating would be very bad for morale I guess.

The beholder like Vrik said.
I actually don't know why we must be rated on face anyway

Interesting topic...

On 2022-10-29 17:54:35 ( Aunty ) Sage said:
Thankfully most clients are very kind.
Just take the ratings on looks with a pinch of salt.

Most ladies that are not very beautiful are fully aware but getting constant 1 as a rating would be very bad for morale I guess.

The beholder like Vrik said.
I actually don't know why we must be rated on face anyway

As usual you are absolutely right, Anutie
Look at it this way:
Nobody ever looks at the mantleshelf when he is poking the fire.
LOL

On 2022-10-29 16:49:29 Kokoran said:
Do punters who give a lady 5/5 for face and compliment them on beauty understand the term beautiful. It's so disappointing when guys go crazy about a girl only to find out that some people's perception is skewed.

The entire review system is subject...

All these 1 to 5 rating systems have this problem. People have written academic papers about how to interpret the ratios between the 1s and 5s to gauge the true sentiment.

I think most guys choose girls who in their opinion are beautiful in their eyes to start off with. Perhaps at the level of woman that they believe they would not be able to attract otherwise. So naturally, if the event is memorable enough to warrant a review, a 5 will most often be the number.

I also think if the woman's body is generally the type he likes (which we can see in the pictures) men will forgive looks (of which the only unknown is just the face at this point) to a degree if the personality and attitude and on point. I've actually only seen 1s and 3s in reviews where the guy also talks about bad service/attitude.

On 2022-10-29 17:54:35 ( Aunty ) Sage said:
Thankfully most clients are very kind.
Just take the ratings on looks with a pinch of salt.

Most ladies that are not very beautiful are fully aware but getting constant 1 as a rating would be very bad for morale I guess.


The beholder like Vrik said.
I actually don't know why we must be rated on face anyway

Couldn't agree more. I personally prefer to rate girls based on what they can improve on, privacy, service, personality and cleanliness. You may rate whether they looked like in the photos etc. but to rate the face down is just demoralizing to the WG. And I guess most punters dont wanna do that as we don't wanna end up with shortage of WGs in the industry.

It's become the norm/standard to just put 5 for face unless the SP is just plain ugly (don't think there's many of those around). In the "normal" ratings world (out of 5), a 3 is average (ok or so-so), 4 is very attractive and a 5 is "bombshell".

beauty is in the eye of the beholder