Navigation
![]( "A member of ESA for less than a year")
![]( "A member of ESA between a year and five years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than five years, but less than 10 years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than 10 years")
![]( "Gold Member")
![]( "ESA staff met this punter in person")
![]( "A respected member of the community, with consistent helpful posts")
![]( "One of our Wicked Wendesday Winners")
![]( "Directly helps ESA in the recruitement of new advertisers")
![]( "Donated to Charity")
![]( "Is the owner/manager of a venue advertising on ESA")
![]( "Part of the ESA Photography Team")
![]( "Received the Punter Of the Year Award")
Hover mouse over icons for description
-
First glance WG rating
Posted: 2013-04-18 15:39:41
I had some time over lunch and was wondering which City - for me -has the most beautiful WG advertising on ESA. So I took the forst 10 pages and divided the girls according to first impression (no opening of further photo's or reading comments) and classified them into (a) stunning (b) good (c) ok and (d)no categories. It literally took me ten miniutes to do all. Here my result:
Stunning: CT 11% PTA 10% JHB 8%
Good: 16% 16% 12%
OK: 56% 45% 39%
No: 17% 29% 41%
Pretty close scoring ;-)
Stunning: CT 11% PTA 10% JHB 8%
Good: 16% 16% 12%
OK: 56% 45% 39%
No: 17% 29% 41%
Pretty close scoring ;-)
Reply
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.