Kindly share the what's app conversation where I was cold and you still saw the need to show up. My communication is always precise,I don't lead anyone on.

On 2025-09-08 10:06:38 Sexysalie said:
You dont have to believe that I your democrat right

Like I've stated on the other advertisers profile that you tried to ruin the reputation of, it's not about democratic rights, it's about respect, and clearly you don't respect a woman. She is not an object, she is a woman and deserves to be treated like one. I personally would marry a lady in this field, because they are human and not objects.

On 2025-09-08 10:59:21 Nala said:
@MHI @Raawi I appreciate you standing up for my honour..will forever pride myself in providing great service

You welcome and I know I haven't personally visited you, but I surely will one day soon.

On 2025-09-08 17:33:11 Sexysalie said:
The hotel is Cresta Grande Cape Town dont have the exact date but it was a week day. Well as said can believe me or ignore it was my experience with you.

From what I've read today between the two ladies you clearly tried to ruin the reputation of, that it's more you don't respect them as women, you treat them as objects.

Name: Nala

City: Johannesburg

Area: Midrand/Waterval City

Last Visit: September 2025

Full Profile: [View Nala's Full Profile]

______________________________________________________

--- THIS IS A ROOKIE REVIEW ^* ----
I saw Nala at short notice on Monday.

On the location. The venue is a private apartment which was very clean and well kept - shower included. Privacy was marked down slightly because of the gate guards who have to scan your drivers license etc when driving in.

She greeted me in a lovely pink dress, showing off her curves in all the right places. Couldn’t help but enjoy myself from that point onwards.

Will definitely return.


______________________________________________________

Ratings:

Face: 5/5
Body: 5/5
Personality: 5/5
Telephone Manner: 5/5
Venue Cleanliness: 5/5
Personal Cleanliness: 5/5
Privacy: 4/5
Service: 5/5
______________________________________________________

Will you return? Yes
Advertiser looked like the Photos? Yes
Secure Parking? Yes

PS: To easily submit a review like this, go to the Advertiser's page and click "Rate this Advertiser" (if you are a Gold Member) or "Review this Advertiser" (if you are a Free Member)

* Until CN1002 built up some Street Cred, Rookie Reviews will not be tracked on the Comments and the Review By Area system.

Was such a pleasure boo,see you soon.

Hi Nala,
I don't usually keep WG WhatsApp messages on my phone for long due to personal reasons, especially if it's been a while. You asked about the hotel, and I did share that it was Cresta Grande Cape Town. We did meet, and I remember us having a brief conversation. I asked what led you to this line of work, and you mentioned it was to support your studies. I also asked if you had a boyfriend, and you said yes, though he wasn't aware of what you do.

What made me uncomfortable was when you mentioned that full GFE and anal were extra via WhatsApp, and your rate at the time was R1200 per hour. However, during the session, when I tried to kiss or touch you intimately, you said that wasn't allowed and asked if I would go around kissing strangers. That moment really put me off, and I decided to leave. I paid R1000, even though the session lasted only about 10 minutes.
You might be the best WG to others but not to me so I have moved on and my review was based on my actual experience with you.
Just to clarify, I consider myself clean and well-presented and have been told this before, because it is the first excuse wg used when they offered what was told.I don't know if you were having an off day, but I wouldn't book again. That said, I wasn't rude, and I even brought a few things along. This topic is close now for me

As someone who has personally engaged with Nala and experienced firsthand her warmth, professionalism, and consistently high standards, I feel compelled to respond to the claims you've made here on this thread - @Sexysalie.

Your review appears to rest entirely on a WhatsApp exchange that, by your own admission, no longer exists, allegedly a meeting between you and Nala took place. You've stated you "don't usually keep WG WhatsApp messages" and cannot recall the exact date of your alleged interaction. Yet despite this lack of verifiable detail or evidence, you've chosen to cast aspirations on someone who has built a reputation on being respectfu, clear and sincere in her communications.

Describing her tone as "very transactional" feels more like a personal interpretation than an objective reflection of her conduct. Nala is known for being straightforward and clear, traits that many of us deeply appreciate in an industry where ambiguity can lead to confusion or discomfort. There is a marked difference between being direct and being cold, and in my experience, she strikes the balance beautifully.

Moreover, it's troubling to suggest discomfort based on services discussed via WhatsApp, when you allegedly proceeded to meet her. Without that interaction, how can one fairly assess the full experience, let alone question her attitude or integrity?

Nala has rightly asked for the conversation that supposedly led to your discomfort. If it can't be produced, and no meeting actually took place, then I believe it's only fair to question whether your review reflects a genuine encounter, or simply a misjudged exchange that should have ended privately rather than being aired publicly in a way that effects someone's hard-earned reputation.

I've always found Nala to be an exceptionally kind, grounded, and considerate individual, someone who takes pride in what she does and treats others with dignity. She deserves reviews based on real experiences, not speculative criticisms that lack evidence or context.

Thank you @Raawi, appreciate the vote of confidence. Will certainly continue giving reputable service.
Cheers

@RaawiThank you for sharing your perspective. I appreciate that you've had a positive experience with Nala and feel strongly about defending her reputation. My intention was never to undermine her character or professionalism, but simply to share my own experience, which while brief left me feeling disappointed.

I did meet Nala, and while I no longer have the WhatsApp messages, I clearly remember the interaction. I understand that memory alone doesn't constitute hard evidence, but I also believe that reviews, by nature, are personal reflections. Just as yours highlights her warmth and professionalism, mine reflects a moment where expectations didn't align, and I felt uncomfortable.

Describing her tone as "transactional" wasn't meant as an attack it was how I personally experienced the interaction. I respect that others may interpret her directness differently, and I'm glad that many find it reassuring. But for me, it felt impersonal, and that's valid too.

I didn't post my review to stir controversy or damage anyone's reputation. I paid for a service, had an experience, and chose to share it honestly. I've moved on, and I wish Nala continued success with those who connect with her style and energy.

Let's allow space for differing experiences without assuming ill intent. That's how we keep these platforms fair and useful for everyone.