Wow, indeed, you are usually kak with words, but that just about sums it up babe! Thank you for our dinner date and taking me to see the doctor, even though I actually felt physically worse the next day, lol. Thank you for looking after me!

I'm ready for our quickie dinner date now if you want to fetch me! He he

On my way,xxx

@petecam at least you got a text to camcel.
I wouldn't mind a text canceling a booking.
Most of the time you rock up at the venue and there is just no answer.

I don't know why people are suddenly against top 10, I seriously doubt if there would be this discussion if it was not because of Vanilla's achievement on this site.

Having seen a long time punter like Interpridus praising her so much and actually declaring publicly that he has found what he's been "wishing" for was actually a confirmation to me that she's that good.

I spent 5 hours with her earlier and believe me having to leave is always difficult, she makes you feel that you just can't get enough of her while some ladies make you feel like they want you out ASAP.

Ladies who are on top 10 especially those on all time top 100 earned such positions, it comes with hardwork.

I also think that this is only about Vanilla.
If her visitors like her enough to vote for her, then good for her.
She is absolutely doing something right.
I voted for her, and she deserved my vote.
She made me feel very special.

A question maybe off topic. If a lady gets 50 +1 ratings, which is not great service, would she still end up in the top ten? I. E is it just a sum of all the plus ratings?

I think the current system somewhat skews things. To me it is a mere indicator. I rely mostly on the feedback from certain reliable punters whom I know report consistently. I see high scores mostly as an indicator of a successful marketing campaign. This is evident when we see top ten girls drop out when their marketing efforts slow down.
Im not saying they are not good but I am saying that there is room for a more equitable system.

I said a few posts back that I had not thought of all the dynamics surrounding the top 10. I have also repeatedly said that its nothing to do with the girls on the top 10 but rather a massively inaccurate/unfair assessment of the total average on a monthly basis. I was merely making a suggestion as to the calculation of the top 10.

If Vanilla is indeed that good, she will not slip from her spot. In fact, what I've suggested and by her overall ratings thus far, she'd have no reason to worry.

Instead, I get attacked and put down with no valid reason. It's obvious the system is flawed, anyone that isn't a Vanilla fan can see that. By the sheer number of votes she receives, she has no reason to worry and you would realize this isn't an attack but a valid suggestion that could in fact give those on the top ten more credibility in it's increased accuracy.

See it as you will. I'm done with this. You guys have made it about a girls worth as a service provider without considering what I was initially suggesting and degraded it to a mud slinging match.

Regards, V.

Well that escalated quickly ( insert picture of escalator )

;-)

On 2017-01-03 10:56:49 Veronica Franco said:
I said a few posts back that I had not thought of all the dynamics surrounding the top 10. I have also repeatedly said that its nothing to do with the girls on the top 10 but rather a massively inaccurate/unfair assessment of the total average on a monthly basis. I was merely making a suggestion as to the calculation of the top 10.

If Vanilla is indeed that good, she will not slip from her spot. In fact, what I've suggested and by her overall ratings thus far, she'd have no reason to worry.

Instead, I get attacked and put down with no valid reason. It's obvious the system is flawed, anyone that isn't a Vanilla fan can see that. By the sheer number of votes she receives, she has no reason to worry and you would realize this isn't an attack but a valid suggestion that could in fact give those on the top ten more credibility in it's increased accuracy.

Veronica, now you are contradicting yourself. You may be genuine with your suggestion, but saying things like, "This thread is only insulting to girls without confidence in their own abilities that do rely more on their minions to keep them going!", makes it seem like you are disingenuous.

We can't ignore the fact that there are familiar faces on the top 10 each month, and if you say the system is flawed and not a true reflection of 'a top 10', you are implying that those specific ladies would probably not be in the top 10 if their minions did not keep them there.