Now let me sit back and wait for Kate's response to see who is actually at fault.

Still giving the lady and the chop both benefit if doubt but I have been in this industry long enough to know that some punters do take advantage of WGs good nature and that is what it looks like to me.

So let me wait.

On 2022-11-22 19:06:58 berserker said:
Maybe she is going through a rough period in her life or has other issues and isn't thinking straight...I would have given her a week and warning that you would post this on the forum and on her profile...seems a bit petty and vindictive.

If you read what he said, seems like he gave her plenty of time and chance to rectify the situation, and as a measure of respect by way of return she blocked him.

This is known behaviour for Kate, just check her profile and reviews, it seems to happen every few months to different people.

Why is there always a "reasonable" justification for doing the shitty thing when it takes zero effort to not abscond with someone's cash.

That is a choice and speaks volumes about the character of someone who opts into taking the cash cow for a ride when there was also the options of just telling the cash cow the relationship was no longer enjoyable or to break it off in a way which doesn't end with someone taking money under false pretenses?

On 2022-11-22 19:51:25 JP82 said:
On 2022-11-22 19:48:32 Arhwen said:

Funny how it's ok for you to expose people on open forum but when I do it it's of bad taste.

Karma baby karma;)



Have you hit your head or is your reading comprehension just that poor?

My issue wasn't that you exposing someone was in "bad taste", its that you hijacked an entirely separate discussion to do it. (You notice how I started a thread on this? instead of hijacking an entirely unrelated one?...)

High 5 to you for starting your own thread I'll give you a noddy badge but wait for Kate to respond because I might have to give you 2

On 2022-11-22 19:52:52 Arhwen said:
Now let me sit back and wait for Kate's response to see who is actually at fault.

Still giving the lady and the chop both benefit if doubt but I have been in this industry long enough to know that some punters do take advantage of WGs good nature and that is what it looks like to me.

So let me wait.

This sounds a lot like you have already made up your mind (and not based on any of the evidence/allegations but on the fact that JP called you out in a different thread), and you're just waiting to accept anything Kate says.

I would bet a lot of money on Arhwen 'judging' that JP is in the wrong no matter what.

Ok so here's what i see:

We need to forget all the other side statements that is not related to the topic at hand

Here's the OP side of story:
The OP and Kate made arrangements for an all nighter
A fee was agreed and Kate requested 3k deposit and would use some of that money to book the accommodation.
According to OP Kate did not do this agreed and vanished with that deposit money.

OP, what was the total fee agreed at for the all nighter?

We await Kate side of the story

On 2022-11-22 20:01:06 Teletubby said:
On 2022-11-22 19:52:52 Arhwen said: Now let me sit back and wait for Kate's response to see who is actually at fault.

Still giving the lady and the chop both benefit if doubt but I have been in this industry long enough to know that some punters do take advantage of WGs good nature and that is what it looks like to me.

So let me wait.

This sounds a lot like you have already made up your mind (and not based on any of the evidence/allegations but on the fact that JP called you out in a different thread), and you're just waiting to accept anything Kate says.

I would bet a lot of money on Arhwen 'judging' that JP is in the wrong no matter what.

We have a gambler/fortune teller in the house.

I have not made up my mind though I am entitled to say what it looks like so rather put your money away before you start a thread that I robbed you of your hard earned cash.

Anyway I'm not interested in you or your thoughts on me that's your business and it has nothing to do with me lol if you want me to live rent free in your head then knock yourself out ;)

Ok so here's what i see:

We need to forget all the other side statements that is not related to the topic at hand

Here's the OP side of story:
The OP and Kate made arrangements for an all nighter
A fee was agreed and Kate requested 3k deposit and would use some of that money to book the accommodation.
According to OP Kate did not do what was agreed and vanished with that deposit money and has been avoiding OP

OP, what was the total fee agreed at for the all nighter?

We await Kate side of the story

Imagine a punter tips you an extra R200 for a few visits then books you for 2 hours and promises to ewallet you then changes his story once he leaves and says that fee is to be deducted from the tips, would the Wg be taking advantage of the punter?

The golden rule in this industry:
All money to be paid in person, at the time of the appointment.
Absolutely no exceptions. It is better for the client and for the working lady. Neither gets cheated out this way.

It will be good to hear her side of the story too and have some balance.

In life we sometimes have to let things go and move on. If someone's been there for you and good to you countless times in your time of need, discounted or not, and even if they "transgress" once, ruin not that memory and appreciation