Dude did you not once post that any punter who booked me would not be a friend of yours. Lol dude guess how many of them do book and don't review.

I was going to leave this alone but since you are painting such a distorted view of things I feel like I should clarify some things.

On 2016-01-28 20:11:47 Indian Courtesan Lalita said:
@QCumber I tried several times very difficult when a guy plays the sympathy card implying that you almost caused him a heart attack so you should hear him out.

You lie like a cheap rug. You said once at the beginning of the call that you didn't usually take calls from unknown numbers and I even offered to call you back with my number exposed. But you had started to rant and there was no stopping THAT train.

I also never implied that you gave me a heart attack. What I actually said, and bear in mind this was after nearly an hour and a half of us screaming and shouting at each other because you simply cannot BEAR to let anyone speak, was that you had gotten me so worked up that I needed to take my heart pills. That wasn't a ploy for sympathy, it was a bald statement of fact. I DO have a weak heart. I have had 5 heart attacks and quadruple bypass surgery. Those are verifiable facts. The REASON I was so worked up was because you accused me of supporting and condoning rape, abuse and murder. When accused of such things in a PUBLIC FORUM I think getting worked up is a little justified, don't you?

So what you said to Qcumber above is an absolute bald faced lie. The reason you didn't hang up had NOTHING to do with me playing the sympathy card because that only happened after nearly an hour and half into the call, at any time of which you could have hung up.

On 2016-01-28 20:11:47 Indian Courtesan Lalita said:
That was not enough he wanted me call up two of his regulars to give him a good reference so I could change my opinion about him.

Again, a partial truth but mostly a lie. What I actually said was: if you had any doubts about my sincerity about being vehemently opposed to any form of abuse, or any doubts about the way I treat working girls, that if you wanted to get an unbiased opinion that you should call those two ladies, since they had met me and spent time with me, whereas you haven't (yet still felt the need to cast stones from your glass house).

It is painfully obvious to anyone that reads your rants on this forum that you hold punters, and men in general, in utter contempt.

I can be an abrasive, sarcastic bastard at times. I own that. I speak my mind without applying filters. I like to have the last word. I own all of that. Some people like it, some don't, and that's fine, I do not post the things I do to impress anyone. You, on the other hand, constantly try to impress everyone with what a "strong" woman you are. You confuse irrational belligerence with strength and assertiveness. The more you lie, rant and fabricate things to suit your warped reality the more people will see you for exactly what you are: a weak, cold misandrist.

@oraljim you going to change your tune now. That is not what you posted on the initial thread. Classic case of very selective memory.

You have a problem with advertisers calling out punters who are troublesome, yet you thought you had every right to call up an advertiser to argue your point.

You just had to take it offline, off the forum and infringe on my personal time. Now if an advertiser dared to sent an sms or called a punter up you would have caused the biggest fuss on the forum. You should practice what you preach. There cannot be one set of rules for punters and different set for advertisers. That is just plain double standard!!!!!!!!!!

On 2016-01-28 20:52:42 Indian Courtesan Lalita said:
You have a problem with advertisers calling out punters who are troublesome, yet you thought you had every right to call up an advertiser to argue your point.

Again you show how wrong you can be. I have *never* had a problem with advertisers calling out punters for bad behaviour. I have only ever had a problem with them posting PERSONAL INFORMATION IN A PUBLIC FORUM when doing so. There is a dedicated, private, not-crawled-by-google-so-it-remains-forever forum for doing that. Your argument for that was most girls dont read the advertisers forum and therefore feel they have the right to use the public forum to air their grievances. I have never, not for a nanosecond defended the actions of the men that have been "outed" on the public forum. But you can't see that. You see any attempt to inform the girl that breaching privacy as the same as supporting the punters bad actions. The fact that you cannot separate those two concepts shows just how deficient your thought processes are.

[QUOTE;494368;Indian Courtesan Lalita]Now if an advertiser dared to sent an sms or called a punter up you would have caused the biggest fuss on the forum. You should practice what you preach. There cannot be one set of rules for punters and different set for advertisers.[/QUOTE]

Now this subtle, and I doubt your feeble intellect can grasp this but lets see if you can spot the difference between those two cases: your phone number is PUBLICLY ADVERTISED. A punter's isn't. Since you are advertising a service it is reasonable and rational to expect a call on that number at any time. A punter isn't in that same boat, so sending an unsolicted SMS or call is NOT THE SAME THING.

And since you are obsessing with it so much let's just settle the score financially. I charge my clients $125 an hour or part thereof. That means that call to you cost me $250. By your logic that means you owe me R4125. However, since I am not irrational, and recognise that it was MY CHOICE to call you, I won't bill you for it. Since it was YOUR CHOICE to engage me on the call and not end it, I don't "owe" you either. But if you want to have it both ways I am happy to send you a bill for R2625 which is the difference in value between my time and yours.

My advert with my telephone number is for clients to call and enquire about my service and to book a session with me not for Esa forum members to call me up and discuss my comments on the forum. I charge for my time and you called me.

Once again just like some male reasoning you think because advertisers details are available online you are entitled to call and we should listen to you even though you are time wasting nuisance.

What the f#*ck were you thinking calling up an advertiser to discuss a forum comment? You worked yourself up to such a frenzy that you had to take pills before you called me.

Just For Future Reference....Oraljim is one of the nicest people that I have had the pleasure of meeting. In the many hours that we have shared I can say without a shadow of doubt that he has the utmost respect for all women and more so ladies that are in this industry. There is no way that a man of his nature could condone any form of abuse.

My unbiased opinion

On 2016-01-28 21:18:19 Indian Courtesan Lalita said:
Once again just like most male reasoning you think because advertisers details are available online you are entitled to call and we should listen to you even though you are time wasting nuisance.

Again proving that you are a misandrist. Keep going, I am sure that is wonderful for business, making comments that "most males" think alike. That's not terribly different, and no less offensive, so saying "most Indians are thieves" or "most Muslims are terrorists". You are showing how profoundly narrow minded you are. You also couldn't be more wrong about how I think about when I am entitled to call an advertiser. If you recall when you answered the phone I introduced myself, explained WHY I had witheld my number and I *ASKED* you if we could talk about your forum posts. You could have said no, and you could have hung up. You didn't do either. Stop trying to foist responsibility for YOUR actions onto me.

[QUOTE;494375;Indian Courtesan Lalita]You worked yourself up to such a frenzy that you had to take pills before you called me.[/QUOTE]

As was very clearly stated above by me, and alluded to by you, I didn't take them BEFORE I called you, but after nearly an hour and a half of arguing with you. You want to talk about selective memory? Try being so selective you can't even remember a post you read 21 minutes ago.

You may intimidate your slaves who like to be anally fisted. You do not intimidate me so you can stop trying. I see you for exactly what you are.

Lady Ray he paid you for your time. Difference is he called me up, wasting my time that other punters pay for.

He asked me to call up two of his favorite regulars. I didn't have to because its not my business what his relationship is with his regulars.

On 2016-01-28 21:21:08 Lady Ray said:
Just For Future Reference....Oraljim is one of the nicest people that I have had the pleasure of meeting. In the many hours that we have shared I can say without a shadow of doubt that he has the utmost respect for all women and more so ladies that are in this industry. There is no way that a man of his nature could condone any form of abuse.

My unbiased opinion

Thank you, thank you and a million times thank you Lady Ray. You are an absolute gem and not just for the above. Your elegance and gentility are the stuff of legend.

Jirre people...let it go
#laatonsnaai