On 2017-03-11 14:45:16 johndoe69za said:
On 2017-03-11 14:33:03 Ziske said:

True yes some don't have much of a choice. However that should never be the excuse to start offering such risky services as if it is a norm to add that as an extra

The question I have for you Ziske is what are you prepared to do to ensure that your kids do not go to bed starving?

Hypothetically speaking as I have no idea whether or not you have children or even like children

I will do anything for my kids @johndoe69za

However I will never risk my life or health. I mean what is the point of getting sick and dying, never to see your kids grow up just because you needed "extra" money?

There are many other means that I've done to ensure my kids have food and a roof over their heads, and none of it involved risking my life or health, feeling guilty or pressured

It pains me to read about scenarios as this...young girls being forced into the industry, because of circumstance...just crazy in this day and age that they don't take the information taught in schools to heart. In our days we weren't taught nearly as much as what kids are made aware of in schools today. There's NO excuse in my mind that girls advertising these services are not aware of the risks. They either already have contracted some or other std or are infected with HIV, thus making them offer such services with disregard.

Stay safe everyone and don't take risks! It could be your last risk!!

MR
XOXOXO

this is very bad. hope there is someone that can show that girl in the right direction....

AGREE with Ziske !!

On 2017-03-13 08:06:44 Ziske said:
On 2017-03-11 14:45:16 johndoe69za said: On 2017-03-11 14:33:03 Ziske said:

..... none of it involved risking my life or health, feeling guilty or pressured

Am sorry to tell you this, but your chosen profession means both your health and life are always at risk, please do not forget this as when you become complacent is when the risk increases dramatically

That I fully understand sir, what I actually meant was I am not going to expose myself to such high risks just for a quick buck

Wonder net, if the guy don't cum inside the lady, surely the risk should be smaller for the lady? The thought ran through my mind since someone up there mentioned a lady didn't want him to cum in her, saying she's not on the pill. But, chances that a bareback lady don't use the pill are poeperig.

Toskoppie regardless of chances being lesser to a degree it is still there. Alas if you are doing this kind of activity the least of your worries should be pregnancy.

Still at the same time if the wg is to fall pregnant she would have her platter of punters with high incomes to pay child support.

Wow... n stilbek is n heelbek.. laat ek eerder niks se nie

Thanks Zwan. And yes, if a guy hear a lady's not using the pill, he surely won't cum, so, smart move from the ladies to reduce the risk. I would bet a dollar that they were on the pill!

And no, I don't and never would be thinking of bareback with a WG. Not smart, at all.
The thought on a possible lower risk just ran through my mind so asked you smart people :-) To be honest, my thoughts at that moment been that it should be impossible to pick up something from a gent if he doesn't cum. But guess there's a possibility of something creeping out..

Sorry about spelling oopsies up there, way past sleepy.