Surely as a venue owner, you do not suspend a SP unless there is irrefutable evidence of the alleged blackmailing incident unless of course, a few unrelated punters echoes the same sentiment. From what I can gather, it only invloves one punter at this stage.

On 2023-03-18 12:07:23 eziguy said:
Surely as a venue owner, you do not suspend a SP unless there is irrefutable evidence of the alleged blackmailing incident unless of course, a few unrelated punters echoes the same sentiment. From what I can gather, it only invloves one punter at this stage.

One punter is one punter too many. But I agree that they need to investigate.

On 2023-03-18 12:07:23 eziguy said:
Surely as a venue owner, you do not suspend a SP unless there is irrefutable evidence of the alleged blackmailing incident unless of course, a few unrelated punters echoes the same sentiment. From what I can gather, it only invloves one punter at this stage.

Well actually suspension is the normal course of action in most industries and allegations. Then follows and investigation which either results in termination or reinstatement.

N4P

On 2023-03-18 13:45:39 Need4Passion said:
On 2023-03-18 12:07:23 eziguy said: Surely as a venue owner, you do not suspend a SP unless there is irrefutable evidence of the alleged blackmailing incident unless of course, a few unrelated punters echoes the same sentiment. From what I can gather, it only invloves one punter at this stage.

Well actually suspension is the normal course of action in most industries and allegations. Then follows and investigation which either results in termination or reinstatement.

N4P

You cannot compare this industry to the formal job sector, N4P. I'm betting my left nut that she has not been placed on paid leave, so either the venue has more information than what they are leading us to believe or it is entirely unfair to the SP to be left without a source of income while the evidence is finding its way to the establishment's owner.

On 2023-03-18 14:15:42 eziguy said:
On 2023-03-18 13:45:39 Need4Passion said: On 2023-03-18 12:07:23 eziguy said: Surely as a venue owner, you do not suspend a SP unless there is irrefutable evidence of the alleged blackmailing incident unless of course, a few unrelated punters echoes the same sentiment. From what I can gather, it only invloves one punter at this stage.

Well actually suspension is the normal course of action in most industries and allegations. Then follows and investigation which either results in termination or reinstatement.

N4P

You cannot compare this industry to the formal job sector, N4P. I'm betting my left nut that she has not been placed on paid leave, so either the venue has more information than what they are leading us to believe or it is entirely unfair to the SP to be left without a source of income while the evidence is finding its way to the establishment's owner.

And don't forget the punters that may be blackmailed when visiting the establishment and how their lives could get fucked up of it's true.

N4P

The same can be said about any other venue, the risk of being blackmailed exists. In this here case, it makes no sense to suspend a SP based on a rumour alone so I don't believe that the venue owner is playing open cards.

If you are worried about your life being fucked. Dont punt. Dont play in the mud and expect not to get dirty. We all know that there are risks. Anywhere you go.

I think there is more to this story. I dont think its as cut and dry as it as people make it sound.
The old three sides rule.

I have visited this venue a few times. Been with the SP in Question a few times. This will not stop me from going back to the Venue or Seeing the SP.
My experience with the venue and the SP has always been positive and my opinion is that she is actually a nice person. Maybe she got a bit Naughty... maybe not.

I am sure that the owner will handle this correctly, without outsiders adding fuel to the fire.

This is just my 2cents.

Wat was the outcome of this? I see they told her to leave the place so was it true? I c she at a new place with new name. Want to check before I make the visit to her. But I want 2 so let us know.

On 2023-03-18 14:32:36 eziguy said:
The same can be said about any other venue, the risk of being blackmailed exists. In this here case, it makes no sense to suspend a SP based on a rumour alone so I don't believe that the venue owner is playing open cards.

It is not the venue that are blackmailing it is an SP. Any SP could do it, whether working for a venue or not.

Hats of to the Benjamins for their actions, it was the right thing to do to "remove" the SP from the environment till the truth has been revealed.

On 2023-04-11 20:09:21 Kooni said:
On 2023-03-18 14:32:36 eziguy said: The same can be said about any other venue, the risk of being blackmailed exists. In this here case, it makes no sense to suspend a SP based on a rumour alone so I don't believe that the venue owner is playing open cards.

It is not the venue that are blackmailing it is an SP. Any SP could do it, whether working for a venue or not.

Hats of to the Benjamins for their actions, it was the right thing to do to "remove" the SP from the environment till the truth has been revealed.

Always good to remove the rotten apples but the posts from Benjamin's give the impression that this happened on more than one occasion, unless their initial post was a knee jerk reaction.