FPJ thank you for the Jimmy Choo perfume ,the wine and other goodies. You truly are the type of men we want to see more of. Very much appreciated.

On 2022-12-11 09:25:50 Johnny English said:
Let's look at the word, generous" and the term, "letting him/her off the hook".
If you want to claim that you are being "generous" and "letting someone off the hook", you don't first harpoon your target, finish them off and then claim you are being generous by releasing them from their impalement. If you want to be generous, you say, "fuck it, she was always been there for me, even discounting many of my "sessions", let it be, I'll be generous and let her off the hook for her indiscretion and not go public" (and not harpoon her in the first place).

You really are painfully stupid. The matter would never have been resolved or discussed by the two of them if he hadn't called her out. Happily being scammed isn't 'generous', it's being a schmuck.

On 2022-12-10 08:10:11 Arhwen said:
This post of mine itself will weed out the good guys from the bad guys, the good guys will see it for what it is while the bad guys will have issues with this post.

There is (at the very least) a third option - that there may genuinely be issues with your post and someone commenting on those issues isn't a "bad guy", simply observant? Not saying that is the case - to be perfectly honest it was too long for me to read - just saying that it really means nothing if you try frame it as only two choices.

On 2022-12-11 11:25:51 Teletubby said:
On 2022-12-11 09:25:50 Johnny English said: Let's look at the word, generous" and the term, "letting him/her off the hook".
If you want to claim that you are being "generous" and "letting someone off the hook", you don't first harpoon your target, finish them off and then claim you are being generous by releasing them from their impalement. If you want to be generous, you say, "fuck it, she was always been there for me, even discounting many of my "sessions", let it be, I'll be generous and let her off the hook for her indiscretion and not go public" (and not harpoon her in the first place).

You really are painfully stupid. The matter would never have been resolved or discussed by the two of them if he hadn't called her out. Happily being scammed isn't 'generous', it's being a schmuck.

Hey tubby...Teletubby then in the same breath why not allow SP's the same allowance of voicing their frustrations publically without her immediately be jumped on as a prostitute in defense of her being a "cheating lieing deceitful " whore who is out there to scam ?...and would NEVER have rectified a supposed wrong.



...and when she wishes to share her side of story because it has gone public why the hesitancy to believe her truth?


So many loopholes in that specific story ...more like a cry for pity considering the back and forth from the OP.

What if she was the first to come forth with an intricate tale that made no sense as in the case made reference to....?

I know!

She would have been told to take it to the girls forum as it is so distasteful putting it out there and even being accused of painting ALL punters with the same brush.

Generosity comes in many forms and sometimes those that lack it are, as u say .... painfully stupid.

:)



RB.

On 2022-12-11 11:34:23 oraljim said:
... just saying that it really means nothing if you try frame it as only two choices.

Bridge too far. Enlightenment unachieved.

On 2022-12-11 12:30:27 JamesSpader said:
On 2022-12-11 11:34:23 oraljim said: ... just saying that it really means nothing if you try frame it as only two choices.

Bridge too far. Enlightenment unachieved.

Lol, all doors and windows to enlightenment shut. No light can get in.

N4P

On 2022-12-11 11:49:26 Russian Bridgitte said:

Hey tubby...Teletubby then in the same breath why not allow SP's the same allowance of voicing their frustrations publically without her immediately be jumped on as a prostitute in defense of her being a "cheating lieing deceitful " whore who is out there to scam ?...and would NEVER have rectified a supposed wrong.



...and when she wishes to share her side of story because it has gone public why the hesitancy to believe her truth?


So many loopholes in that specific story ...more like a cry for pity considering the back and forth from the OP.

What if she was the first to come forth with an intricate tale that made no sense as in the case made reference to....?

I know!

She would have been told to take it to the girls forum as it is so distasteful putting it out there and even being accused of painting ALL punters with the same brush.

Generosity comes in many forms and sometimes those that lack it are, as u say .... painfully stupid.

:)



RB.

1) Because I am one of apparently two people who took the OP up on his offer to see the whatsapp conversations. So she is free to tell her side, but if it doesn't stack up with what actually *demonstrably* happened between the two of them, I'm not going to swallow it hook line and sinker like you'd prefer.

2)i have never (and to my knowledge neither has the OP) dismissed anything anyone has said because they are an SP, and I have never referred to anyone as a whore. So don't you dare try imply that I've dismissed "her truth" because of what she does.

3) she blocked him. Ignored his calls and dms. And only responded like seven months later after he posted publicly, so I don't think assuming she wasn't going to rectify it is too much of a stretch.

4)i don't know if she would have been told to take it to the ladies forum. I wouldn't have told her that, and just like I'm not responsible for other punters telling sps to "stay in their lane" I'm not going to defend what other punters might hypothetically have said.

In the words of Albie Sach:
"You are entitled to your Indignation. Just remember that your Indignation may spark the Indignation of others..."

I DARED Teletubby and..u responded.

Thank u.

:)

RB.

On 2022-12-11 12:30:27 JamesSpader said:
Bridge too far. Enlightenment unachieved.

I confess I don't understand this post. But that's to be expected I am just a dumb punter.