On 2022-08-08 10:27:47 Slyboy said:
I don't mean to come across as insensitive, I do recall you having a very strong opinion about money and making money. Maybe that is the one thing that stands out in this guys mind that he wouldn't want you to feel he is part of you loss of earnings if he doesn't pay for your time, that is what it is right time that we pay for and part with.
And maybe becoming more or less than a transaction takes away from the allure of the experience.
Just thinking out loud
On 2022-08-08 09:59:19 Miss Red ( Aka Louise ) said:
On 2022-08-08 09:49:14 Sabrina @ Le Belle said: Thank every single one of you for your input.
I understand what you guys are saying, and I would've accepted the 'transaction' had I not mentioned to him I don't want payment every time. I saw him without expecting anything other than the time spent together as two human beings, and he threw it in my face.
It is called "keeping the money in the middle"... it is to safe guard againt creating expectations or seeming to be receptive of advances made "out side of the transcational part".
Sorry to say but seems you fell for a guy that definitely does not want to move past the "transactional" although he enjoys your company he instinctively knows that if he does not "pay" he will be giving you "hope" for there to be something more , that something more is something he ain't willing to give.