one part of me says to name and shame.

my concern is what if this system becomes a way of unfairly targetting a wg by a disgruntled client or another wg?

I get this industry has it's bad apples and neither side is perfect but just worry that the same mistake is just being repeated.

granted I have no answer or solution to these kinds of problems, just trying to avoid the sex industry version of the witch trials.

Ok, at least State the area then.. is her ad active? Or did you find her number on another site?

On 2022-11-28 05:00:31 Theand said:
one part of me says to name and shame.

my concern is what if this system becomes a way of unfairly targetting a wg by a disgruntled client or another wg?

I get this industry has it's bad apples and neither side is perfect but just worry that the same mistake is just being repeated.

granted I have no answer or solution to these kinds of problems, just trying to avoid the sex industry version of the witch trials.

But then what was the point of your original post?

I am with Wolfie....

Another ass trying to get attention

Why drop a post like that if you don't drop the name of the WG involved? Are you seeking some attention or what? Without the name of the WG involved you have wasted a lot of peoples time and made some folks even more paranoid. Do the right thing, and if it is not true what you are saying then rather just shut-up.

name and shame , some wg's don't learn

On 2022-11-28 08:08:39 WolfieX said:


But then what was the point of your original post?

firstly,not my post. only adding to the post.

I was challenging the idea that if name and shame becomes the practice, how do we stop it from being abused from just anyone?

On 2022-11-28 09:46:26 Theand said:


I was challenging the idea that if name and shame becomes the practice, how do we stop it from being abused from just anyone?

Fair point though post like these then just add to the stigma that all ladies in this industry are not to be trusted when we know that like you get good punters and bad punters, You get good WGs and the Not so Great one's.

How then do we combat this?

When I was away traveling so many guys begged me not to share details meaning that because others have shared their numbers they thought it wise to ask me not to share theirs which I could understand but in all honesty I was a bit insulted too as I am the type of lady who would lie to my clients wife if he was abit clumsy and he left trails for his wife to find.

On 2022-11-28 10:41:30 Arhwen said:


Fair point though post like these then just add to the stigma that all ladies in this industry are not to be trusted when we know that like you get good punters and bad punters, You get good WGs and the Not so Great one's.

How then do we combat this?

It doesn't take one long to find posts on this forum to find finger point from both sides. Was trying to say let us not make the same mistake with another potential divisive post.

I thought about this, and I think it ties a lot in with the thread of burner/punter phones, Anonity and just how we all treat each other/attitude.

For me Anonymity is key here. If all communication between Punter and WG is the burner phone which should only be on during the "punting window".

I have always given a fake name, and I routinely switch between names (which becomes a bit of juggle when seeing multiple girls at once and then finding a regular, what name did I used with that girl). Assuming the "warrant officer" calls you, he should at least know your real name. If he was real but if referring by fake name, dead give away. Changing of the name you may pinpoint the exact lady if you kept track. Golden rule, factory reset after each punting window, switch off the phone, battery and Sim card out (overkill but there is another reason why). When hiding the phone, hide the sim card in different location to the phone and ffs, not in your wallet.

As far as the lady goes, If I am dissatisfied with the service or felt concerned about her intentions, I actually don't review her and if I feel I am really wronged by her, I simply don't visit her again. My reasoning is I don't know her, I don't know her day and I don't what problems she is all dealing with. If I have a bad day, I can claim a "sick day". I think for WG, its perhaps not as easy as that. There is not "sick leave" claim they can make. I feel that is the one way I can hold a WG to account but not by unfairly tarnishing her reputation based on my assumptions or what is only my side of the story. Takes 2 to tango so that means there are 2 sides to the story. In my mind that filters the good from the bad. I have gone back to some ladies giving them the benefit of the doubt but then some I have simply crossed off and made up my own banned list. If a Wg wants a share of my finances, good service and don't screw me over. Screw me but don't screw me over.

That is just the simplest approach I feel and the cleanest cut from messy situations.

I get it we are supposed to have the reviews system on here but the number of times I have walked away from a fantastic hour, questioning why she doesn't have any positive reviews (don't want to digress here but again so many scenarios to cover here). The reviews/comments system isn't always true reflection and can be abused, has been abused. Another example is when Asian girls are questioned if they are "coded". As punters, we are not held much to account and get away it with not even a slap on the wrist. I just think the challenges of a lady, trying to start out in the industry and then slapped almost immediately with a bad review (and possibly unfair one too).