Navigation
Johnny English
Johnny English - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Gold Member
Joined:
10 Dec 2018
Posts to Date: 1828
View Profile
Posted: 2022-04-10 06:59:18

Skin to skin, eyeball to eyeball !
Kooni
Kooni - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Gold Member
Joined:
18 Jun 2019
Posts to Date: 3391
View Profile
Posted: 2022-04-10 08:15:10

On 2022-04-10 06:48:11 hbviper said:
On 2022-04-10 00:09:33 Russian Bridgitte said: On 2022-04-09 21:46:44 hbviper said: I must say, do not know why I started reading this thread, but it all started with a punter being offered bare back sex, which sounded like he declined, and which some other punters ask to have, then went to RB who attacked Sabrina, without any good reason, sounded like RB wanted an argument to happen, then Miss Red, still cannot figure out if she stood up for Sabrina, or sided with RB, and then came Rossia who clearly thinks of cock and made the threat so much more worthwhile to read.

So, Sabrina, keep on using lol, no problem with that, RB, rather create your own thread and look for arguments on there, as I see it, you had a problem with Sabrina and targeted her, and Rossia, keep doing what you doing and enjoy the champagne.

FYI, all names mentioned accounts was active when posting the comment on the thread

Dearest hbviper

Why should there have been an argument? Unless one is defensive....otherwise i dont get it.

Can u explain maybe?

RB

RB, I really do not have to explain anything. Just go read your own first post on the forum, and that is absolutely self explanatory, which I will highlight below:

"Without sounding like I am looking for an argument..."

That statement, says it all




The "lol" were not that innocent, and therefore the response from RB.

The sad thing here, Sabrina is known for getting "nasty" at the cost of other SP's, and the "lol" was just another example.
Sabrina
Sabrina - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Advertiser
Joined:
9 May 2021
Posts to Date: 632
  View Profile  
Posted: 2022-04-10 09:25:53

Obviously the lol was a dig and not innocent. So what?
Sabrina
Sabrina - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Advertiser
Joined:
9 May 2021
Posts to Date: 634
  View Profile  
Posted: 2022-04-10 09:30:52

On 2022-04-10 06:48:11 hbviper said:
On 2022-04-10 00:09:33 Russian Bridgitte said: On 2022-04-09 21:46:44 hbviper said: I must say, do not know why I started reading this thread, but it all started with a punter being offered bare back sex, which sounded like he declined, and which some other punters ask to have, then went to RB who attacked Sabrina, without any good reason, sounded like RB wanted an argument to happen, then Miss Red, still cannot figure out if she stood up for Sabrina, or sided with RB, and then came Rossia who clearly thinks of cock and made the threat so much more worthwhile to read.

So, Sabrina, keep on using lol, no problem with that, RB, rather create your own thread and look for arguments on there, as I see it, you had a problem with Sabrina and targeted her, and Rossia, keep doing what you doing and enjoy the champagne.

FYI, all names mentioned accounts was active when posting the comment on the thread

Dearest hbviper

Why should there have been an argument? Unless one is defensive....otherwise i dont get it.

Can u explain maybe?

RB

RB, I really do not have to explain anything. Just go read your own first post on the forum, and that is absolutely self explanatory, which I will highlight below:

"Without sounding like I am looking for an argument..."

That statement, says it all



That blonde wig from Pep Stores has rubbed off on her. Maybe we can start a raffle to buy her more, as she only has the one.
Sabrina
Sabrina - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Advertiser
Joined:
9 May 2021
Posts to Date: 635
  View Profile  
Posted: 2022-04-10 09:31:59

On 2022-04-10 02:27:04 jtrdbn said:
On 2022-04-10 02:13:04 Rossia said: Sabrina and i going to be a team:)

That's a hot team!



I agree. She has sex appeal that's off the charts!!!
hbviper
hbviper - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Basic Member
Joined:
22 Nov 2011
Posts to Date: 558
View Profile
Posted: 2022-04-10 10:15:32

On 2022-04-10 08:15:10 Kooni said:
On 2022-04-10 06:48:11 hbviper said: On 2022-04-10 00:09:33 Russian Bridgitte said: On 2022-04-09 21:46:44 hbviper said: I must say, do not know why I started reading this thread, but it all started with a punter being offered bare back sex, which sounded like he declined, and which some other punters ask to have, then went to RB who attacked Sabrina, without any good reason, sounded like RB wanted an argument to happen, then Miss Red, still cannot figure out if she stood up for Sabrina, or sided with RB, and then came Rossia who clearly thinks of cock and made the threat so much more worthwhile to read.

So, Sabrina, keep on using lol, no problem with that, RB, rather create your own thread and look for arguments on there, as I see it, you had a problem with Sabrina and targeted her, and Rossia, keep doing what you doing and enjoy the champagne.

FYI, all names mentioned accounts was active when posting the comment on the thread

Dearest hbviper

Why should there have been an argument? Unless one is defensive....otherwise i dont get it.

Can u explain maybe?

RB

RB, I really do not have to explain anything. Just go read your own first post on the forum, and that is absolutely self explanatory, which I will highlight below:

"Without sounding like I am looking for an argument..."

That statement, says it all


The "lol" were not that innocent, and therefore the response from RB.

The sad thing here, Sabrina is known for getting "nasty" at the cost of other SP's, and the "lol" was just another example.



@Kooni, maybe so which you are saying, but the fact is, RB was looking for an argument and took the whole conversation away from what it originally was intended for.

I just do not see how "lol" was getting nasty to other SP's, and to be honest, maybe I am just "dof", but no reason for RBs response at all. My opinion.
Sabrina
Sabrina - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Advertiser
Joined:
9 May 2021
Posts to Date: 637
  View Profile  
Posted: 2022-04-10 10:53:03

On 2022-04-10 10:15:32 hbviper said:
On 2022-04-10 08:15:10 Kooni said: On 2022-04-10 06:48:11 hbviper said: On 2022-04-10 00:09:33 Russian Bridgitte said: On 2022-04-09 21:46:44 hbviper said: I must say, do not know why I started reading this thread, but it all started with a punter being offered bare back sex, which sounded like he declined, and which some other punters ask to have, then went to RB who attacked Sabrina, without any good reason, sounded like RB wanted an argument to happen, then Miss Red, still cannot figure out if she stood up for Sabrina, or sided with RB, and then came Rossia who clearly thinks of cock and made the threat so much more worthwhile to read.

So, Sabrina, keep on using lol, no problem with that, RB, rather create your own thread and look for arguments on there, as I see it, you had a problem with Sabrina and targeted her, and Rossia, keep doing what you doing and enjoy the champagne.

FYI, all names mentioned accounts was active when posting the comment on the thread

Dearest hbviper

Why should there have been an argument? Unless one is defensive....otherwise i dont get it.

Can u explain maybe?

RB

RB, I really do not have to explain anything. Just go read your own first post on the forum, and that is absolutely self explanatory, which I will highlight below:

"Without sounding like I am looking for an argument..."

That statement, says it all


The "lol" were not that innocent, and therefore the response from RB.

The sad thing here, Sabrina is known for getting "nasty" at the cost of other SP's, and the "lol" was just another example.

@Kooni, maybe so which you are saying, but the fact is, RB was looking for an argument and took the whole conversation away from what it originally was intended for.

I just do not see how "lol" was getting nasty to other SP's, and to be honest, maybe I am just "dof", but no reason for RBs response at all. My opinion.



You're not dof, you're absolutely right. I'm done now. I have beautiful Cape Town to enjoy today. Thank Ra x
Kommerq
Kommerq - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Basic Member
Joined:
27 May 2021
Posts to Date: 594
View Profile
Posted: 2022-04-10 12:41:36

Tannie RB kry tog nou rus asb, klim van jou perdjie af.
[deleted]
[deleted] - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Less than 100 posts
Posted: 2022-04-10 12:59:51

This is not shocking. Been offered many times and at extra cost, sometimes WG slides it in and pretend that it's a mistake then says if you pay more you can have it since you also feeling how warm it is.
There's rub rub, those that know they will understand. So many WGs and Punters do rub rub and don't see anything wrong with it but see penetrating raw as wrong. Some give it in the ass raw but not in the pussy and you wonder why because risk is the same.

The truth is that it's happening more than WGs would admit even with very popular ones and those that are the most vocal in the forums, if there were no repercussions punters would name them (destroying WGs name, reputation and business, risking the punters real identity being exposed and blah blah, so many risks to coming out with info, it is also said that some WGs work for the intelligence or supplier them with info about punters).

Prep exist and also post exposure, many WGs are taking ARVs either to protect themselves or because they are infected, you will never know because they will not consume them in front of punters. Punters must just do the same. ARVs make people gain wait (just saying and don't judge people because of this comment). Now there even a vaginal ring that has passed in SA for women and when it start being available, there'll be much more bare back than ever before, just get on with the times and adjust. I'm Sh*T scared tbh but that's reality and everyone knows that it's nicer and will not stop now.

If a punter who does this weekly, monthly and yearly can have a condom burst and sometimes only discover too late, what about WGs who do this for a living, take an average of 5-7 a day or minimum of 3 punters a day? There days when there 0 and there's days when that number changes.

Last thing, there's no truth in this industry, Rather take the word of someone that offers you upfront than those that pretend it doesn't happen when they are doing it daily.

StaalBurger48
StaalBurger48 - Re: Bare Back
Re: Bare Back
Basic Member
Joined:
29 Sep 2017
Posts to Date: 574
View Profile
Posted: 2022-04-10 15:56:49

On 2022-04-10 12:59:51 shyshy said:
This is not shocking. Been offered many times and at extra cost, sometimes WG slides it in and pretend that it's a mistake then says if you pay more you can have it since you also feeling how warm it is.
There's rub rub, those that know they will understand. So many WGs and Punters do rub rub and don't see anything wrong with it but see penetrating raw as wrong. Some give it in the ass raw but not in the pussy and you wonder why because risk is the same.

The truth is that it's happening more than WGs would admit even with very popular ones and those that are the most vocal in the forums, if there were no repercussions punters would name them (destroying WGs name, reputation and business, risking the punters real identity being exposed and blah blah, so many risks to coming out with info, it is also said that some WGs work for the intelligence or supplier them with info about punters).

Prep exist and also post exposure, many WGs are taking ARVs either to protect themselves or because they are infected, you will never know because they will not consume them in front of punters. Punters must just do the same. ARVs make people gain wait (just saying and don't judge people because of this comment). Now there even a vaginal ring that has passed in SA for women and when it start being available, there'll be much more bare back than ever before, just get on with the times and adjust. I'm Sh*T scared tbh but that's reality and everyone knows that it's nicer and will not stop now.

If a punter who does this weekly, monthly and yearly can have a condom burst and sometimes only discover too late, what about WGs who do this for a living, take an average of 5-7 a day or minimum of 3 punters a day? There days when there 0 and there's days when that number changes.

Last thing, there's no truth in this industry, Rather take the word of someone that offers you upfront than those that pretend it doesn't happen when they are doing it daily.



There are lots of truths in this post.
And yes, WG's are expected to make an issue out of bareback, although it's a daily occurrence.

Reply

You must be logged in to post on this forum. Basic Membership is free and it only takes a minute to sign up. Alternatively, if you are already a member, please log in. You will be automatically returned to this page.

Legend


Hover mouse over icons for description

Back to Previous Page
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.