Listen, let's be fair here.

Although some people would like to pretend that they are selling milk and cookies here, that is not the case. This is a mature industry. Man up or move out.

The reviews are for punters to share whether it is worth paying for a punt or not. The criteria involve those things important and related to this decision.
If girls want to read it, do so, but it is not actually a complimenting blog- it is an informative, subjective sharing of experience between men to help each other choose the best available options out there and also to avoid the nasties.

So really, stop whining like a bunch of woosies. Review with fellow punters in mind, this is not a dating site.

Lancelot so true, the saying goes, if you can't handle the heat get the hell out of the kitchen. Have a awesome day everyone.

Lancelot, some of us come from a time where "Manning up" included treating a lady with respect, irrespective of what she's selling.
It's also a time where people were entitled to their own perspectives. You're entitled to your view as well. Opinions being as common as assholes, I certainly won't begrudge you yours. Enjoy the weekend.

On 2017-01-13 12:00:57 oraljim said:
@Eazy1 I think you are missing the point of a review. A review is not meant to be objective, but instead totally subjective. It is impossible to be objective about pretty much any metric, whether its face, body, service level etc, because everyone's expectations of those metrics differs and there is no objective standard against which you can measure them.

No, the point of a review is so that other people, who over time develop an affinity for your tastes, can see how you subjectively rated someone. For example, 5 guys visit WG X. 3 of them rate her looks a 5, 2 of them rate her a 3. You visit her yourself, and decide she is also a 5. You now have one small affinity data point with regards to those 3 reviewers. Over time you build up a repertoire of people whose reviews align with your own tastes. You're into feet and shemales? You pay attention to Ben Layden's reviews. You like curvy black ladies? Listen to garyj. You like skinny blonde white chicks? You listen to someone else. And so it goes on.

It is exactly the same with any review system for anything except scientific peer review, which is objective. But for movie reviews? You will find yourself trusting reviews by Ebert, but not Roper. Restaurant reviews? You trust Bob more than Bill. It is why review aggregators are so successful - if even a broad range of people who usually disagree on reviews all give something high scores, you know it must be good.

So yes, things like face, body etc are subjective, but that is the entire point of reviewing. Of course this works best with a broad range of people doing reviews, which is what the REAL problem with the current review system is - not enough people use it, or use it only in the extremes - every girl either gets 5 stars or 1. The review is either glowing, or scathing. A lot of peopel don't write their honest feelings because they may want to return to the girl, even if the service wasn't perfect, and don't want to "poison the well" by leaving a critical review.

True that which you raised as per quote. I actually had developed or was a follower of 2 punters who seemed to have the same taste as me.However about 60% of the time I visited the recommended, there was no connection between me and the S/P's. When I looked at the reviews, the SP's were coming up as stars as they have immaculate reviews. On that note, I never put up a review if it was on that basis of no connection. & make no mistake I never go back to that SP hoping for an improvement on the next visit. All those experiences have put me in a position to actually venture into unreviewed territories and put the first review which has offen rendered the SP very busy and even difficult for me to get a booking for another visit. All bookings that I have made, I always brought up my expectations upfront. If no chemistry is there, it ends up being like a duty for her instead of fun and mechanical for me which I'm afraid that it will be read out of context. Make no mistake though, if a service is bad I hold back no punches. I let it all out for all who use stats on reviews to make a selection.