This forum has always been a space I've respected for its community-driven approach and the trust we place in one another in the over 10 years that I've been involved in it. It's where punters and SPs come together to foster meaningful interactions. That trust is what makes this platform valuable, which is why I feel compelled to speak up about something deeply troubling that affects us all.
About a year ago, I discovered evidence that a particular SP might be involved in activities that compromise safety on this platform. Due to suspicious behaviour, I got a SIM card to contact this SP, and no one else, after a few days I was contacted by a cop scammer. I knew this wasn't a coincidence, so I reached out to ESA support privately to share what I had found and ask for an investigation. I even followed up with information from another punter who had contacted only two SPs with one of them being the same as the above and was then contacted by the "same cop" but my messages were ignored.
The SP (Patty):
www.esa.co.za/escorts/viewEscort.php
When it became clear that nothing would be done, I posted about it publicly. Others joined the conversation, sharing similar concerns about the same SP, making it clear this was not an isolated issue.
Almost a year to the date, I posted a topic asking what it would take for ESA to ban scammers. Instead of addressing the problem, my account was banned, and I was accused of being someone I am not (Stiffyrichard). For context, I am not located in the Western Cape, where Stiffy seems to reside based on his reviews, and I have no connection to him.
I welcome the moderators to substantiate this claim with the evidence they used to arrive at this conclusion or acknowledge that this was an error. Silencing users who raise valid concerns by banning them and making unfounded accusations does not serve the community; it undermines it.
Interestingly, after I emailed the moderators to ask about the ban and reiterate my concerns, I noticed that their post referencing my ban was edited about 5 minutes afterward, removing any mention of the ban. Despite this, even this email was ignored, and my account was not just banned (because I could still log in) but deleted entirely (I can't even reset my password on it). It's hard to understand why this level of erasure would be necessary unless there was a deeper issue at hand.
The moderators' initial response to the "banning post" was particularly revealing. When I first raised the issue, I was told that "buyers posting on their profile a year ago to 'avoid avoid' is not evidence of anything" and that "there is no evidence this advertiser is a scammer." I was accused of having a "personal vendetta" and told that the forum's time is "best spent listing new advertisers" rather than "chasing alleged scammers." To be clear, this SP has zero reviews because they never answer calls, making it impossible to book them, let alone leave a review, which was the behaviour that first made me suspicious. Since the rules say you can't post a review without seeing the SP, this makes it impossible to document issues on profiles, as a non gold-member, with an SP who operates like this, creating a system where concerns like this are left unaddressed by design when coupled with ESA also ignoring you.
This isn't the first time concerns like this have been raised. In fact, there is precedent with, at least one, similar case leading to swift action and the banning of the SP. Why was this case treated differently? Why has this SP remained active for over a year despite multiple complaints and red flags?
It's hard not to question whether there is more to this than meets the eye. Is this SP receiving protection? Are there relationships or incentives influencing the decision to ignore these complaints? I don't want to jump to conclusions, but the inconsistency and defensiveness here are troubling.
This is not just about me though, I'm done with all of this. It's about the integrity of the forum and its ability to protect its members. Punters deserve to feel safe. Honest SPs, who rely on this platform to build trust with their clients, should not have their reputations tarnished by association with scammers. And as a community, we deserve fairness, accountability, and consistency.
If others have experienced similar issues, whether it's scams, ignored reports, or unfair treatment, I encourage you to share your story. A strong community is built on trust and accountability, and that starts with us.
For reference, here is an example of the similar case where the forum acted quickly to ban an SP with less evidence seemingly provided.
www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php.
This shows what's possible when these issues are handled properly, and I hope we can return to that standard.
If you got this far, thank you for reading.
Other important threads:
1. Where my suspicion first started:
www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php
2. Where I further gathered my evidence
www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php
3. Where I first came out to the public with my findings after ESA ignored me.
www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php
4. Where I got banned and accused of being someone else:
www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php
You decide.
Sincerely,
Formerly DickRich2