Well excuse me, gents. Those of you who have read my posts know that I’m generally not the type to be all negative about a WG even when she offers a quite poor service , but please, PLEASE stay away from ‘Marie-Louis’. She used to advertise as ‘Bridgette’ on ST. She no longer allows comments on that site, and there’s a reason for this. All comments were very negative, and rightfully so! I booked her once, but got nothing but a meagre attempt at a BJ, ‘something’ she did with her hand which was supposed to be a handjob, but nothing more. Oh no, I’m wrong: she did give me a long, very, very very long story about her personal problems. She insisted on being paid in full however and refused to leave my place before I handed over the cash. BE WARNED

i think what is more worrying, is that she has 2 adverts... one where she states she is a she-male and the other where she gives *zero* indication that she is anything else besides a full-blooded female.

now i have no problem with her advertising as a she-male if she is one. many punters are looking for that, and i have no problem with their choice.

but the last thing i want is to start not trusting any of the ads i see. because i personally do not wish to discover a 6' *surprise* between the girl i have chosen's legs.

even if that ad *is* in the specialist section, there is no indication as to what her speciality is. she could be a dominatrix, she could have two pussy holes... there needs to be an indication on all her profiles as to what she offers...

Good morning, HarveyD

I will contact the relevant agent and I her amend the advert accordingly.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

Eddie
ESA SUPPORT