On 2023-09-19 11:23:59 Mic24W said:
...
"Characteristics of study participants
Table 1 displays the prevalence of HIV and the characteristics of the South African population (aged 15 years or older), stratified by racial classification. HIV prevalence was highest in Black South Africans (20.54%), followed by Coloured (4.06%), Asian (0.90%), and White South Africans (0.37%)"

...

What interesting stats.

Firstly, there's a major floor in that it it says characteristics of the study but then infers it to the population but doesn't so correctly. I'd assume it's 20% of the study done on a higher risk group and probably the incentive to participate would lean towards them were whites "couldn't give a fuck about participating in shit like this" that they believe doesn't affect them. Or "what the fuck is R200 gonna do for me to give up 1 hour of my time?" But to the ones with no job and incomes, they wait the whole day just to try and get into that survey to get that R200. They have more blacks to participate so you get higher numbers. Simple as that.

Secondly, if indeed those 20% are HIV positive, then they're fucking around willy nilly getting punani for free unlike many of us having to pay for it so they won't be punting let alone punting here in one of the most expensive platforms when they can get bareback for one quart Black Label.


JP69

Hmm I see my name is mentioned....