Navigation
![]( "A member of ESA for less than a year")
![]( "A member of ESA between a year and five years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than five years, but less than 10 years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than 10 years")
![]( "Gold Member")
![]( "ESA staff met this punter in person")
![]( "A respected member of the community, with consistent helpful posts")
![]( "One of our Wicked Wendesday Winners")
![]( "Directly helps ESA in the recruitement of new advertisers")
![]( "Donated to Charity")
![]( "Is the owner/manager of a venue advertising on ESA")
![]( "Part of the ESA Photography Team")
![]( "Received the Punter Of the Year Award")
Hover mouse over icons for description
-
Re: What are all these new statuses next to a persons profile....met in person,
Posted: 2013-04-09 13:48:06
Dude get a life plz
-
Re: What are all these new statuses next to a persons profile....met in person,
Posted: 2013-04-10 19:12:54
I agree fully with Kraatos.
On the topic of Kickass, I have no reason to beleive he is unreliable in anyway. He actually seems the opposite, he seems like a trusting naive "good guy". I don't take his reviews too seriously because he does not seem like a person with particularly acute discretionary capacity. To add to that it seems that a lot of the WGs on this site have him wrapped around their fingers.
Back to the badges, particulary the reliable punter one, there are a lot of reliable punters who seem to have gone unoticed by esas punter grading system and there are a lot of relatively new punters who seem to have reputable statuses. What criteria did esa use for this?
On the topic of Kickass, I have no reason to beleive he is unreliable in anyway. He actually seems the opposite, he seems like a trusting naive "good guy". I don't take his reviews too seriously because he does not seem like a person with particularly acute discretionary capacity. To add to that it seems that a lot of the WGs on this site have him wrapped around their fingers.
Back to the badges, particulary the reliable punter one, there are a lot of reliable punters who seem to have gone unoticed by esas punter grading system and there are a lot of relatively new punters who seem to have reputable statuses. What criteria did esa use for this?
Reply
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.