Going through the reviews of the ladies, I kept looking for the punters with the most posts, as Im likely to give those more weight.

Can ESA consider this? Having options to sort reviews (number of posts, years on the forum, reliable, etc).

Thanks.

Are you suggesting a way to go through just reviews done by punters?

Just search by their username, under "search forum"...
all posts should be visible there.

On the left of all the Punters you will see Posts to Date

Hope that helps...

Not much use, someone who was good last year may monger be good.

Secondly punters active on the forum land up in trouble and get new names.

As a gold member you can see the top 100, start there, it is not like there are that many reviews to search through

So this was one of the conversations I had with one of my client's. He is a very reliable Punter. Years a Gold member on ESA.

HE'S OUTLOOK:

So yes.. most of the girls have high ratings.... Well done. But just do some homework and go read the fine print. That ladies are on ESA for years if not over 10. Now new ladies join ESA and have little to no ratings on their profiles. He didn't check when she joined. Run and do a quick check on the rating system page, and decide to skip. How is that then fair to be judged by a rating system?

He told me a lady can be the best SP/WG/MG today, but tomorrow She's the worst he ever had.

He got a valid point I say.

So, my opinion, give a lady with a low to no rating a equal opportunity to prove her service to you. She must start somewhere to build up an reputation. 99% is in it for a good reputation... So I hope...

Liza, you are a very wise lady ;)

On 2020-10-25 02:25:53 johndoe69za said:
Not much use, someone who was good last year may monger be good.

Secondly punters active on the forum land up in trouble and get new names.

As a gold member you can see the top 100, start there, it is not like there are that many reviews to search through

So based on your advice to start with the top 100.

Who are the better of the 2.

A lady that is in the top 100 that average 50 a year over the last five or more years or a lady that just starting out averaging 15 month.

Only if the review system was reliable, could the Top 100 be seen as reliable.

On 2020-10-25 11:04:08 Kooni said:
On 2020-10-25 02:25:53 johndoe69za said: Not much use, someone who was good last year may monger be good.

Secondly punters active on the forum land up in trouble and get new names.

As a gold member you can see the top 100, start there, it is not like there are that many reviews to search through

So based on your advice to start with the top 100.

Who are the better of the 2.

A lady that is in the top 100 that average 50 a year over the last five or more years or a lady that just starting out averaging 15 month.

Only if the review system was reliable, could the Top 100 be seen as reliable.

I did mention top 100 is something gold users can see, implying that normal users can't.