If u really thought it was me then why didn't you contact me to discuss it?

Say hi K
"l went to the doctor and this is what happened " instead of posting about it ...

It looks like you have an Agenda .Please contact me ,l want to know who you are ?
I keep all my chat history

On 2026-07-14 09:58:00 Jaggerk said:
When I wrote the review, my intention was to be as honest and fair as possible. From a service perspective, I couldn't fault her at all. The only issue was that I ended up contracting an STD, despite the fact that she was the only person I had been with. It's important to note that STDs can be contracted in different ways, not only through sex without a condom. That's why I tried to keep the review neutral rather than harsh or accusatory.

The question I asked about whether she goes for regular health checks wasn't meant to be rude or offensive. I simply wanted to raise the issue respectfully and responsibly.

Also, I didn't log in on 13 July at 13:31 to edit the review, so I'm not sure how that happened. It definitely wasn't me, and I didn't make any changes to the post.

An STD is no joke but it's the risk we take when partaking in this hobby of ours.

Let's be real, any chick offering OWO likely has an STD.

The right way to go about it is to contact the SP to let her know in case she doesn't know then move on with your life instead of posting vague reviews here about whether she goes for regular check ups.

Visit date is July. We are in mid July now. So symptoms showed within max two week period. Not impossible but that is rather quick.

I've read all the comments and noted that I should contact her directly, but I felt that could easily turn into an argument, which I was trying to avoid. Based on what my doctors have told me and the research I've done, STDs can sometimes show up earlier than two weeks even within the first week. I'm not a doctor myself, so I can't give exact timelines, but I stand by the facts I posted. What you choose to do with that information is entirely up to you. I believed this forum was meant for sharing reviews, not for getting into arguments. I don't have time for this, so I'm moving on. You're free to agree or disagree that's your choice. If reviews here are going to be interrogated in this way, I'd rather leave the forum altogether or stop posting reviews in the future.

On 2026-07-14 17:36:34 Jaggerk said:
I've read all the comments and noted that I should contact her directly, but I felt that could easily turn into an argument, which I was trying to avoid. Based on what my doctors have told me and the research I've done, STDs can sometimes show up earlier than two weeks even within the first week. I'm not a doctor myself, so I can't give exact timelines, but I stand by the facts I posted. What you choose to do with that information is entirely up to you. I believed this forum was meant for sharing reviews, not for getting into arguments. I don't have time for this, so I'm moving on. You're free to agree or disagree that's your choice. If reviews here are going to be interrogated in this way, I'd rather leave the forum altogether or stop posting reviews in the future.

Interrogation is healthy. By tucking tail and running you are simply creating the impression of guilt. Be a man and stand your ground and field the questions.

On 2026-07-14 09:58:00 Jaggerk said:

Also, I didn't log in on 13 July at 13:31 to edit the review, so I'm not sure how that happened. It definitely wasn't me, and I didn't make any changes to the post.

Got me wondering, is it even possible to edit your review a whole 30 hours later?? This is very concerning

Jaggerk, you say didn't edit the review, are you implying that ESA edited your review?

Or that your login credentials have been compromised?

Jaggerk - So you would rather argue on the forum than contacting me ?

Until this day l still don't know who you are. How am l supposed to know if l've been with you or not ?

If ever you change your mind about contacting me , l will go with you/alone to do the tests just to ease your mind.
I'm 100% certain that all my results will come back negative because lm always on the guard

On 2026-07-14 20:03:43 danny_dd said:
On 2026-07-14 17:36:34...


Interrogation is healthy. By tucking tail and running you are simply creating the impression of guilt. Be a man and stand your ground and field the questions.

Looks to me like he has stood his ground rather firmly. He said what he needed to and hasn't faulted on that and he's not entertaining catfights and shit. As he said, he have you the information, do with as you please.

JP69

On 2026-07-14 20:24:33 PutaMadre said:
On 2026-07-14 09:58:00 Jaggerk said:
Also, I didn't log in on 13 July at 13:31 to edit the review, so I'm not sure how that happened. It definitely wasn't me, and I didn't make any changes to the post.

Got me wondering, is it even possible to edit your review a whole 30 hours later?? This is very concerning

True. We can't edit anything after 15 minutes of it being posted.

Also, when reviews are edited, they look like dog shit with those < - > things all over the place so not likely he edited it at all.

Probably a blip in the system and that somehow became a big deciding piece of information, lol.

JP69