On 2016-12-30 13:35:38 Sage said:
@ Veronica Franco thank you !I must remember to give Claudia a box of chocolate or something
She's is a wonderfully patient photographer.
I wasn't younger I'm afraid , just illinexperciened ;)

It was that pic set in the white boob tube. I felt like a tit when a punter pointed your age out to me after thinking that I was being nasty to you.

there is nothing more boring than to see review after review an more review of the same ladies. (so called top ...)

On 2016-12-30 13:46:03 lusty.kendra said:
there is nothing more boring than to see review after review an more review of the same ladies. (so called top ...)

Nothing wrong with reviews. That's not what this thread made mention of. We've already assessed reviews are good.

If I am allowed to add my 2c worth. I do not pay much attention to the top 10 although it is nice to see a lady I reviewed reach the top 10. Catch 22 really. I spoke to a lady a while ago and she told me good GM reviews equals improved business. I don't really get it though. Pay the fee get the badge. Being a GM does not make one superior. I wonder why some ladies attract more gold members than others? I always thought it was a "balanced" market out there.

Miss V,
I like the idea of your initial post. Maybe the good people managing the purple world will look at some ideas in the future.

Hi Guys

It is a good suggestion and I will see if I can incorporate it into our next Top 10 system. We want to implement a weighted average, as previously suggested on the forum, into the Top 10.

This means that people with a higher amount of submitted reviews will have a bigger impact on the Top 10 than punters with only 1 review. This should stop anyone from signing up, writing 1 review, and creating a false +5 Top 10 vote as their vote will count very little at the beginning. The system will favour regular reviewers more, but will not completely ignore new reviewers either. The idea is that mathematics will weed out fake votes.

Always keep in mind that, similar to Amazon or Yelp, no matter what we do (or they do), the Top 10 can never be 100% accurate. Amazon cannot guarantee that every review for every product is legit. Yelp's ENTIRE business revolves around reviews, and they too cannot guarantee that every review is legit. Expecting ESA to top or outsmart both Amazon and Yelp is a bit of a stretch.

We will however strive to make the Top 10 as fair as humanly and technically possible. It will however always remain an *indicator* and not an exact science.

We believe the weighted average system would go a long way in making the Top 10 a far better indicator, and as Veronica suggested, it would help if you could "recast your vote" if you change your mind.

Let me see what I can come up with.

Kind regards,

James

I think we all needs to be treated equal i had great reviews on my carmen add for personal reason i changed my name and add..

Give us with no rating a chance .... the same girls on the top 10 is overated.

Maybe the same girls are not allowed on each month... let the system rotate.

To the guys not reviewing us or scared to see one with no reviews u might be loosing out on good pussy.

Kisses
Cam

I know that i don't have all the stats on what it would take to be 100% accurate, and even so it'll never be as such. But surely the same guy/s/gold members voting for the same girl every month isn't a fair assessment at all as we all have our own so-called 'minions' as Eddie loves calling them, lol. Obviously those clients are better serviced I would think and their vote often earns them brownie points with the girls. There again, it wouldn't be a fair assessment of a consistently good service delivery all round as is evident by all the comments one reads on here about being disappointed with top girls service etc etc.

Otherwise, why doesn't esa randomly select girls and have a featured girls section instead of a top ten. The rating system could then be on a separate link with overall top 100.

Another idea might be a most viewed section. Don't know much about the logistics behind something like this, but if possible it can be something like each user gets one click counted on a profile per month. It will not give credibility to the lady, but it might expose ladies who are not reviewed often. This in turn will likely encourage ladies to take pride in their ads. Some ladies have absolutely stunning ads with little to no reviews and other ladies have "general" ads with some reviews to many reviews. Different strokes for different folks, but most men are visual creatures. The better an ad is presented the more chances of said ad to attract new business.

remove the top 10 list and problem solved