On 2026-04-28 22:57:54 Littlerascal said:
On 2026-04-28 18:21:53 Bella La Fleur said: How cool would it have been if we as women too could rate the punter that came..

Imagine you can actually become king of the room for the month??

What would be the upside for being King of the Room? You'd just get punters pretending to be Kick to try and get discounts and freebies.

Not unless you show them your account on the phone. Really isn't that complicated

On 2026-04-28 22:32:35 JackParrow69 said:

How do people actually get the reliable punter badge and the punter of the year thing?

It's voted for by the ladies. You have to simp real real hard. Not say a single bad thing about any wg. Always compliment and defend the wgs. Do bookings and only post positive reviews. Take them out and pay over the asking rate is advantageous. Recommend them often and recommend them like they're the best thing since sliced bread and then maybe some wgs will nominate you for those badges.

JP69

100% agree.
Never seen a "reliable punter" with a single bad review. So please point me in the right direction if you know better.
Imo, you cannot be "reliable" if you never had a bad experience. For most of us, we have good even great experiences most of the time. But every now and then, it is not.

On 2026-04-28 18:21:53 Bella La Fleur said:
How cool would it have been if we as women too could rate the punter that came..

Imagine you can actually become king of the room for the month??

How can a customer be reviewed without providing a service, for the purpose of what, being the whitest knight? Sir/Mr D of the Degenerates

Definitely the wgs should review punters so that the distinction between punters who are reliable and those who are not is made.
The scale should be balanced.
Wgs will review and define what is reliable to them also in terms of

1. Payment
2. Overstaying time ,
3. Hygiene
4. Respecting boundaries

Everytime wgs raise these concerns in the review section they are gaslighted.

But of most importance , if you have never seen a wg, what business do you have passing comments under her review section. Some punters will even post pages and pages of comments about what they think based off another punters 's experience . The review section is for someone who has seen a wg only .There should more strictness in that regard . It is entirely possible for two punters to receive two contrasting experiences from the same girl . A punter 's thoughts and opinions on a review he was never present for is very useless information.

Then two punters should pay different prices. If you get full service, pay full price. If she gives shit service,coat shit price.

Can't be charging same price and offering less.

JP69

Good luck reviewing punters. When I go punting I definitely do not advertise my punting handle and many other don't either.

On 2026-04-29 12:06:52 Griffindude said:
Good luck reviewing punters. When I go punting I definitely do not advertise my punting handle and many other don't either.

OMG. I can't imagine what would happen if I disclosed my punting handle when booking. Kicked out. Lucky I'm just another John Doe that they seem to like mostly.

JP69

The vast majority of punters don't participate on the forum and of those that do, I would think very few reveal their nick

I've heard that Shadow tells all the ladies that he's Pricasso

There also needs to be stricter verification. At the moment, platforms don't always confirm whether a reviewer has genuinely seen the WG, which opens the door for malicious or false reviews. I've personally experienced reviews from people who have never seen me, making claims about hygiene or appearance that my actual clients can confirm are completely untrue.
It's also worth noting that two clients can have completely different experiences with the same person, so second-hand opinions shouldn't carry weight. Reviews should be based on direct, personal experience only.
A fair system should protect both WGs and genuine clients not allow unverified or harmful commentary to damage someone's reputation.