On 2025-11-24 20:25:25 R2D4 said:
On 2025-11-24 20:12:18 JP82 said: On 2025-11-24 16:19:36 R2D4 said: On 2025-11-24 15:57:21 Bobby Z said:

This is basically word salad to say you're a bigot. Got it. Nothing new. It's SA after all.

A bigot is a person who holds unreasonable opinions or beliefs, mine are not unreasonable. I apologise for having an opinion that differs from yours.

Your pretence of intellectual superiority is fascinating. You use a lot of words, yet they simply reveal a mind limited by prejudice & paucity of imagination. It is, perhaps, a mercy that you are in no way clever enough to understand how profoundly stupid you truly are.

Don't worry JPee, I am a lot smarter than your depressed ass could ever be. You have been quiet for a while, were you lurking all this time? I thought you would have deleted yourself by now considering how miserable you are? Nothing and I mean nothing beats your stupidity when you went to visit a young wg and poured your heart out to her only for her to reject you and you to react by claiming she stole your money. You are poor depressed and stupid JP, and you will always be that. You are as incapable of understanding or relating to others as you are of understanding yourself. You are a poor sad wreck of a human being.

Now crawl back to the shadows where you belong. Every time I smash you, you have a nervous breakdown, I am not sure you can handle any more so run along while you still can.

That was quite a performance, little fella (I see you haven't gotten any smarter than you were under you previous usernames) --- a whole tirade built on invented personal details, amateur psychoanalysis, and a cartoon-level misunderstanding of what depression actually is. It's always the people with zero knowledge that try to toss it around like its an insult. Anyone who's dealt with the real thing --- directly or indirectly --- can spot immediately when someone is talking out of pure ignorance. It is literally a medical condition -- a physiological imbalance that can (often but not always) be treated with appropriate medicine. Trying to weaponise it, is like insulting someone for having high blood pressure.

But the funniest part is how emotionally charged you are. You're trying so hard to assert dominance that the strain is practically audible. Screaming about other posters' imaginary lives. Its positively juvenile -- like everything you post. You say whatever you think will sting, regardless of whether it's coherent, accurate, or remotely grounded in reality. It's transparent, and more than a little embarrassing.

But by all means, keep going --- every juvenile outburst like this tells us far more about you than anything you think you're revealing about anyone else. Also its just kinda hilarious that your idea of "smashing" someone always makes you look so fucking stupid.

Agree chief

Facts are facts, doesn't matter if anyone likes it. The lion cannot be blamed for hunting the buck, but a human cannot be excused from his own consequences.

On 2025-11-24 21:02:01 JP82 said:
On 2025-11-24 20:25:25 R2D4 said: On 2025-11-24 20:12:18 JP82 said: On 2025-11-24 16:19:36 R2D4 said: On 2025-11-24 15:57:21 Bobby Z said:

This is basically word salad to say you're a bigot. Got it. Nothing new. It's SA after all.

A bigot is a person who holds unreasonable opinions or beliefs, mine are not unreasonable. I apologise for having an opinion that differs from yours.

Your pretence of intellectual superiority is fascinating. You use a lot of words, yet they simply reveal a mind limited by prejudice & paucity of imagination. It is, perhaps, a mercy that you are in no way clever enough to understand how profoundly stupid you truly are.

Don't worry JPee, I am a lot smarter than your depressed ass could ever be. You have been quiet for a while, were you lurking all this time? I thought you would have deleted yourself by now considering how miserable you are? Nothing and I mean nothing beats your stupidity when you went to visit a young wg and poured your heart out to her only for her to reject you and you to react by claiming she stole your money. You are poor depressed and stupid JP, and you will always be that. You are as incapable of understanding or relating to others as you are of understanding yourself. You are a poor sad wreck of a human being.

Now crawl back to the shadows where you belong. Every time I smash you, you have a nervous breakdown, I am not sure you can handle any more so run along while you still can.

That was quite a performance, little fella (I see you haven't gotten any smarter than you were under you previous usernames) --- a whole tirade built on invented personal details, amateur psychoanalysis, and a cartoon-level misunderstanding of what depression actually is. It's always the people with zero knowledge that try to toss it around like its an insult. Anyone who's dealt with the real thing --- directly or indirectly --- can spot immediately when someone is talking out of pure ignorance. It is literally a medical condition -- a physiological imbalance that can (often but not always) be treated with appropriate medicine. Trying to weaponise it, is like insulting someone for having high blood pressure.

But the funniest part is how emotionally charged you are. You're trying so hard to assert dominance that the strain is practically audible. Screaming about other posters' imaginary lives. Its positively juvenile -- like everything you post. You say whatever you think will sting, regardless of whether it's coherent, accurate, or remotely grounded in reality. It's transparent, and more than a little embarrassing.

But by all means, keep going --- every juvenile outburst like this tells us far more about you than anything you think you're revealing about anyone else. Also its just kinda hilarious that your idea of "smashing" someone always makes you look so fucking stupid.

Lol, as usual JP, you took the bait. Do you really want me to repost all those embarrassing threads where you exposed yourself as a complete idiot? You are a loser and you always will be. Now book another tight young lass and tell her about your depression and how you cant fuck her because even your dick is depressed and cant get hard, im sure she will be able to relate...

Nobody is capable of doubling down on idiocy quite like you. Post the links till your hearts content, because the version of events you keep repeating exists only in your imagination. (Your degree of ignorance about almost every topic is almost impressive btw)

On 2025-11-24 19:03:35 R2D4 said:
On 2025-11-24 17:18:06 Teletubby said: On 2025-11-24

SneakyOctopuss just wrote a damn treatise on why your opinions*ARE* unreasonable. And he's not wrong about plumbing new depths of idiocy.



Which opinions are those Sheila?

What kind of idiot writes a treatise on a sex site and what kind of idiots read it and take it seriously? Only you...

i read his "treatise" and now I am trying to determine who the bigger idiot is, you or him?

Lol , here is an npc idiot calling other people idiots. You were stupid enough to study philosophy in an academic setting. Keep flipping burgers simp. Everything about you screams simp, your entire identity revolves around being acceptable and having a persona that will be socially acceptable. You have not yet evolved to the point of being an authentic individual. I bet you are not even 35. You are not capable of any critical or original thinking. Stick to flipping burgers and being a keyboard warrior because you would get snapped if you even thought about saying anything to me in person.

Oh my fuck you are stupid. Me labelling it a "treatise" was a friendly jab at the length of his post. So when you say "What kind of idiot writes a treatise on a sex site and what kind of idiots read it and take it seriously?..." And then write not one but two posts of even greater length in response, the only conclusion is 1)you're the kind of idiot that writes a treatise on a sex site 2) you're the kind of idiot that reads it, (as evidenced by your response) and 3) you're clearly the kind of idiot that takes it seriously (as evidenced by your child-like temper tantrum). What a spectacular self-own.

(Btw "what opinions?" Your infantile rationalization of racial prejudice, Jackass.

And I'm waaaaaay past 35. Although to be fair I wish I wasn't.

I grew up in an era where *not* being a racist douchebag made you a social outcast amongst my designated group, so there goes the accusation that I'm like this to be "socially acceptable". It seems your "debate" tactic is to make uneducated guesses about people and then try fling insults? It might work if you actually had the faintest clue about psychology, sociology or even could just read people a little better. Unfortunately it seems like just more areas about which you know sweet bugger all)

On 2025-11-24 22:37:14 Teletubby said:
On 2025-11-24 19:03:35 R2D4 said: On 2025-11-24 17:18:06 Teletubby said: On 2025-11-24

SneakyOctopuss just wrote a damn treatise on why your opinions*ARE* unreasonable. And he's not wrong about plumbing new depths of idiocy.



Which opinions are those Sheila?

What kind of idiot writes a treatise on a sex site and what kind of idiots read it and take it seriously? Only you...

i read his "treatise" and now I am trying to determine who the bigger idiot is, you or him?

Lol , here is an npc idiot calling other people idiots. You were stupid enough to study philosophy in an academic setting. Keep flipping burgers simp. Everything about you screams simp, your entire identity revolves around being acceptable and having a persona that will be socially acceptable. You have not yet evolved to the point of being an authentic individual. I bet you are not even 35. You are not capable of any critical or original thinking. Stick to flipping burgers and being a keyboard warrior because you would get snapped if you even thought about saying anything to me in person.

Oh my fuck you are stupid. Me labelling it a "treatise" was a friendly jab at the length of his post. So when you say "What kind of idiot writes a treatise on a sex site and what kind of idiots read it and take it seriously?..." And then write not one but two posts of even greater length in response, the only conclusion is 1)you're the kind of idiot that writes a treatise on a sex site 2) you're the kind of idiot that reads it, (as evidenced by your response) and 3) you're clearly the kind of idiot that takes it seriously (as evidenced by your child-like temper tantrum). What a spectacular self-own.

(Btw "what opinions?" Your infantile rationalization of racial prejudice, Jackass.

And I'm waaaaaay past 35. Although to be fair I wish I wasn't.

I grew up in an era where *not* being a racist douchebag made you a social outcast amongst my designated group, so there goes the accusation that I'm like this to be "socially acceptable". It seems your "debate" tactic is to make uneducated guesses about people and then try fling insults? It might work if you actually had the faintest clue about psychology, sociology or even could just read people a little better. Unfortunately it seems like just more areas about which you know sweet bugger all)

I wasnt rationalising racial prefudice you total imbecile. I did point out that there are differences in preferences, societal development, cultural values etc. Not specific to race necessarily. For knstwnce, why is it that you as a caucasian are hot attracket to bbw black women? I have the view that cultural values lf a certain tribe of people are a product of the level of development of the average individual within that tribe.

Nope, when i say your identity is one that wants to be socially accpetable, i mean that your conception of yourself is based on what you beleive would be considered acceptable within your society. Please show lne example of original thinking in your thousands of posts on the forum, you arent even capable of having your own opinion on things. You are the type lf idiot that is easy to brainwash.

Since you are so knowledgeable, please could you give your opinions on the following:

1- are all cultural values equal?
2- do you have sexual preferences for particular races?
3- why did sub-saharan africa not develop any written language or invent the wheel until the 19th century?
4- If you take a random sample of a 1000 apples out of a million and 800 out of 1000 of those apples were rotten, is it unreasonable to think that the majority of the apples in the batch are rotten?
5- why do you not punt WGs of color?
6- why do different ethnic groups display different traits and behaviours?

On 2025-11-24 19:03:35 R2D4 said:
On 2025-11-24 17:18:06 Teletubby said: On 2025-11-24

SneakyOctopuss just wrote a damn treatise on why your opinions*ARE* unreasonable. And he's not wrong about plumbing new depths of idiocy.



Which opinions are those Sheila?

What kind of idiot writes a treatise on a sex site and what kind of idiots read it and take it seriously? Only you...

i read his "treatise" and now I am trying to determine who the bigger idiot is, you or him?

Lol , here is an npc idiot calling other people idiots. You were stupid enough to study philosophy in an academic setting. Keep flipping burgers simp. Everything about you screams simp, your entire identity revolves around being acceptable and having a persona that will be socially acceptable. You have not yet evolved to the point of being an authentic individual. I bet you are not even 35. You are not capable of any critical or original thinking. Stick to flipping burgers and being a keyboard warrior because you would get snapped if you even thought about saying anything to me in person.

@Teletubby
I see he's still bitter about the time you spanked him over Kierkegaard and he's been seething ever since. LOL

Calling everyone a "simp" and "NPC" while rage-typing anonymous tough-guy fantasies on a sex forum isn't exactly peak "authenticity" or "originality", little guy. It's literally the most generic edgelord-incel script in existence. Precisely zero original thought, just recycled 4chan copypasta.

Yawn, I can read this shit on twatter

On 2025-11-25 03:40:02 R2D4 said:

I wasnt rationalising racial prefudice you total imbecile. I did point out that there are differences in preferences, societal development, cultural values etc. Not specific to race necessarily. For knstwnce, why is it that you as a caucasian are hot attracket to bbw black women? I have the view that cultural values lf a certain tribe of people are a product of the level of development of the average individual within that tribe.

Nope, when i say your identity is one that wants to be socially accpetable, i mean that your conception of yourself is based on what you beleive would be considered acceptable within your society. Please show lne example of original thinking in your thousands of posts on the forum, you arent even capable of having your own opinion on things. You are the type lf idiot that is easy to brainwash.

Since you are so knowledgeable, please could you give your opinions on the following:

1- are all cultural values equal?
2- do you have sexual preferences for particular races?
3- why did sub-saharan africa not develop any written language or invent the wheel until the 19th century?
4- If you take a random sample of a 1000 apples out of a million and 800 out of 1000 of those apples were rotten, is it unreasonable to think that the majority of the apples in the batch are rotten?
5- why do you not punt WGs of color?
6- why do different ethnic groups display different traits and behaviours?

R2D4: "I wasnt rationalising racial prefudice you total imbecile."
Also R2D4: "No, prejudice is a preconceived opinion formed without experience or reason. I am talking about an opinion based on experience."

Pick one -- because the second one is the literal definition of what you say you aren't doing in the first.

As for your psycho-analysis about my need to be "socially acceptable": I already showed that, in the environment I grew up in, rejecting racism made me the social outcast, not the conformist. You ignored that because it doesn't fit your script.

Now, your questions, as pointless as they are:
1. Are all cultural values equal? No, and the culture that produces illiterate keyboard racists who think "tribe development level" is a rational argument is objectively near the bottom.

2. Do I have sexual preferences for particular races? I have, and continue to, punt across races, so no, not really.

3. Why did sub-Saharan Africa not develop written language or the wheel until the 19th century? Written language existed:
* Ge'ez script in continuous use since at least the 4th century BCE
* Ajami literacy across West Africa from the 11th century onward
* Nsibidi and related indigenous systems pre-dating European contact

The wheel was largely irrelevant in tsetse-fly zones that kill draft animals and in terrain that made paved road networks impractical.

Meanwhile:
* Nok culture smelting iron by 1000 BCE
* Great Zimbabwe: 20,000 inhabitants, mortarless stone architecture
* Mali Empire under Mansa Musa: wealthiest polity on Earth in the 14th century
Your premise is not merely incorrect; it is a claim that has been demonstrably false since the 1950s. Read a book.

4. The rotten-apples analogy .
Two fatal problems.
Your "data" do not exist in any verifiable form.
There is no current, publicly available offender breakdown by race. The state stopped collecting it for obvious historical reasons.

Any racial percentages you are using are either invented, lifted from discredited apartheid-era records, taken from private advocacy spreadsheets that have been repeatedly debunked, or most likely in your case extrapolate from personal anecdote.

When independent researchers reconstruct patterns from mortuary data or victim surveys, the apparent racial gap evaporates once income, unemployment, population density, and gang territory are controlled for. These are not random confounds; they are the direct, deliberate products of spatial policy that have never been reversed.

Apples in your analogy are interchangeable by design. Human beings are not. Starting with an analogy that assumes interchangeability and then pretending it applies to people is not a minor oversight; it is the entire trick (whether this is you being stupid or deliberately disingenuous I'm not sure)

Even if we granted your fabricated numbers, the analogy still fails to describe anything except prejudice.

The actual annual probability that any specific individual in the highest-risk demographic commits any serious violent offence is still well under 1 % -- roughly 0.5--0.8 % in the very worst township cohorts during the worst years. Your "800 out of 1000" claim is therefore not an exaggeration; it is fiction by two orders of magnitude.

Coloured men in formerly white suburbs have victimisation and offending rates for serious violent crime indistinguishable from whites. Same gene pool, different postcode and income bracket. The "rot" follows structural disadvantage, not race.

You are using a distorted group average to pre-judge individuals you have never met. That is the textbook ecological fallacy

5. Why do I not "punt WGs of color"? See point 2. I do. The premise of your question is false.

6. Why do different ethnic groups display different traits and behaviours? Primarily environment, history, resource access, and recent socioeconomic conditions. Genetic variation between continental populations is dwarfed by variation within them (Lewontin 1972; reaffirmed by every large-scale genomic study since). The scientific consensus on this has been unanimous for over half a century.
There is nothing original, controversial, or intellectually respectable in anything you have written. You are repeating claims that were already discredited when your grandparents were children.

On 2025-11-25 09:36:09 JP82 said:


@Teletubby
I see he's still bitter about the time you spanked him over Kierkegaard and he's been seething ever since. LOL

Calling everyone a "simp" and "NPC" while rage-typing anonymous tough-guy fantasies on a sex forum isn't exactly peak "authenticity" or "originality", little guy. It's literally the most generic edgelord-incel script in existence. Precisely zero original thought, just recycled 4chan copypasta.

@JP82. Agreed. I'm like 90% certain that his guessing game/insult combination is pure projection. All his deepest insecurities being projected onto others...