I think I have quiet an avarage face and sometimes even less than avarage would be a good description when I am tired and have no makeup on (face in hands)

Luckily for me, men have their own ideas of what is pretty for them and what I think of my face or what anyone else thinks of it don't matter.

Men review and vote based on their own perceptions and preffences when it comes to "pretty" faces.

Most will just vote a 5.
Either because they really loved the face or because they polite and don't want to potentially hurt feelings by saying someones face is less than perfect.

Then others that did not find the face as pretty as their perceptions of pretty will be honest and down vote a bit or ommit to vote on face, for the same reasons they don't want to hurt feelings.

I have never read a "good" review on ESA where any guy has gone straight out voting any lady less than a 3 on face.

The only reviews I ever read that had a less than 3 for face there was other issues like bad service etc coupled with that. Which leaves a feeling of meanness to the review. As surely we can all see she if very pretty and just because her services was lacking does not make her less pretty.

Face ratings are superbly objective. I generally disregard face ratings because they mostly seem to be 5 anyway.

A better marker is how many punters positively comment on a lady's face in reviews and I also benchmark particular punters to see how their tastes compare to mine.

I don't think anyone's rating is wrong but because it is subjective, it helps to look out for ratings from guys who seem to share your tastes.

With that said, thee dick doesn't often care much what the face looks like as long as he's having fun.

There are some pretty WGs out there that also simultaneously quite boring.

I personally also have decided to rate according to a scale where 3 is average, 4 is above average and 5 is exceptional/perfect.

I think it defeats the purpose to automatically assign someone a 5 when when whatever is being reviewed could be better.

That's just me though.

On 2022-05-24 10:17:39 TheeDick said:


I think it defeats the purpose to automatically assign someone a 5 when when whatever is being reviewed could be better.

That's just me though.

We could all be better looking. But we are what we are.

But you do what feels right for you and what you feel adds value to your review and your experience.

On 2022-05-24 10:51:48 Bbw Nadia said:
On 2022-05-24 10:17:39 TheeDick said:

I think it defeats the purpose to automatically assign someone a 5 when when whatever is being reviewed could be better.

That's just me though.
We could all be better looking. But we are what we are.

But you do what feels right for you and what you feel adds value to your review and your experience.

Yes, it's not personal, and wouldn't mean I'd had a bad time, it's just to try give a (subjective) review otherwise I suppose maybe those face/body measures shouldn't be there to start with.

On 2022-05-24 10:15:30 TheeDick said:
Face ratings are superbly objective. I generally disregard face ratings because they mostly seem to be 5 anyway.

A better marker is how many punters positively comment on a lady's face in reviews and I also benchmark particular punters to see how their tastes compare to mine.

I don't think anyone's rating is wrong but because it is subjective, it helps to look out for ratings from guys who seem to share your tastes.

With that said, thee dick doesn't often care much what the face looks like as long as he's having fun.

There are some pretty WGs out there that also simultaneously quite boring.

I meant subjective here, not objective.

On 2022-05-24 12:12:04 TheeDick said:
On 2022-05-24 10:51:

Yes, it's not personal, and wouldn't mean I'd had a bad time, it's just to try give a (subjective) review otherwise I suppose maybe those face/body measures shouldn't be there to start with.

To many guys my body would be a 1. But if you like a more filled out woman, I would be a 4. What also comes into play is how the lady portrays herself in the ad wording and the pics. I portray myself as fat. So if you're into perfect size 34s and you didnt read my ad properly then would it be fair to say my body is a 1? Different thing if my ad was ambiguous.

On 2022-05-24 12:40:20 Bbw Nadia said:
On 2022-05-24 12:12:04 TheeDick said: On 2022-05-24 10:51:

Yes, it's not personal, and wouldn't mean I'd had a bad time, it's just to try give a (subjective) review otherwise I suppose maybe those face/body measures shouldn't be there to start with.

To many guys my body would be a 1. But if you like a more filled out woman, I would be a 4. What also comes into play is how the lady portrays herself in the ad wording and the pics. I portray myself as fat. So if you're into perfect size 34s and you didnt read my ad properly then would it be fair to say my body is a 1? Different thing if my ad was ambiguous.

Your beauty lies in your absolutely honesty, calling a spade a spade, and your low tolerance for BS.

Its not the size of the dress that counts, but the person filling that dress that matters most.

On 2022-05-24 12:40:20 Bbw Nadia said:
To many guys my body would be a 1. But if you like a more filled out woman, I would be a 4. What also comes into play is how the lady portrays herself in the ad wording and the pics. I portray myself as fat. So if you're into perfect size 34s and you didnt read my ad properly then would it be fair to say my body is a 1? Different thing if my ad was ambiguous.

Objectivity aside, most profiles hide the face so having 5s all around when, as even you've stated, no one is perfect, is strange to me.

That's a bit different from a body rating because everyone shows theirs (for the most part) and of course everyone has their preferences there too.

It would an idiot be to mark you down for something that everyone can already see but my rating system isn't just about the physical, service, privacy, etc can't all be 5 unless there was nothing at all wrong with those.

The point of reviews for punters using ESA is to get a bit more confidence about what to expect when booking a lady, the benefit for ladies is punters who are more willing to take the plunge and book because you've got a set of great reviews and they trust the system.

Back to objectivity, each punter has different needs and likes as you've stated and it's up to each punter to make use of the reviews to fulfill those unique needs.

I'd rather have a mutually beneficial and enjoyable punt that fulfills my unique needs any day because my expectations were met than to have a nasty surprise.

Duplicate post.