On 2016-09-02 17:08:36 Fboy said:
On 2016-09-02 16:55:55 Massage By Yvonne said: If I choose not to see, for example an Arab because I don't like the way they puff on their hubby bubbly, who are you to tell me I'm racist?
If you refuse to see an Arab because his an Arab, your a racist.
On 2016-09-02 17:11:56 NotSoShyKev said:
Yvonne with all due respect you are fence sitting here and talking about what is ideal. If ROAR means all that then should it be taken that ladies without ROAR on their profiles accept whatever punter that comes to their door (dirty, rude, whatever). No this is not the case. Every lady here has an undeniable right to choose who they let through their door.
We ALL know that if you place ROAR on your profile on ESA it is pretty much about a selection based on race. Now it's a WGs choice yes but please stop trying to hide behind the widely accepted use of the reservation of admission because it is different in the world of ESA.
The original post asks about what ROAR means here. I can tell you as a punter for years on this site. I know it to MEAN - NO BLACKS and not "Service providers will not see clients who have not showered in days." Call a spade a spade.
On 2016-09-02 17:28:03 SupermanV said:
@ Yvonne - I think the answer to that is clear.
That said, as much as folks in ESA Land get annoyed by NotSoShyKev, I find it interesting that no one actually responds to his often well structured arguments. The use of counter factuals to make a point and the line by line deconstruction of another's argument. My guess is this fella is a lawyer.
What's funny is how those he is up against respond just like Donald Trump by completely ignoring his point and sticking to their guns even after he has skillfully illustrated gaps in their arguments. SMH. Its just not worth it brother.
On 2016-09-02 17:38:42 Fboy said:
On 2016-09-02 17:28:03 SupermanV said: @ Yvonne - I think the answer to that is clear.
That said, as much as folks in ESA Land get annoyed by NotSoShyKev, I find it interesting that no one actually responds to his often well structured arguments. The use of counter factuals to make a point and the line by line deconstruction of another's argument. My guess is this fella is a lawyer.
What's funny is how those he is up against respond just like Donald Trump by completely ignoring his point and sticking to their guns even after he has skillfully illustrated gaps in their arguments. SMH. Its just not worth it brother.
Especially with such brilliant counter arguments as 'bla bla' and 'same old' hahaha