That's good news !! Ek wou kom kuier het met my baas se ID nou is ek save .

On 2016-11-21 10:34:34 Orpheus said:
@Shamrock which ladies left them

Lady Ray and Raven have both left. Those are the two I know of. There could be others.

On 2016-11-21 14:45:29 Meg said:
Our complex started to sign in some people... when I asked the a copy of proof that any detail given on that paper can't be used... they couldn't show up with it...hmm and that was head of security.
Now they don't sign my clients in anymore.
Good for me good for the clients.

So if one of your clients now bumps someone's car in the complex, or steals something, or heaven forbid, commit a more serious crime - there is no lead to find the culprit?

Sorry, but that is why I live in a secure complex, and if I find out that anybody's guests have not been signed in properly, I will take drastic measures.

Oh dear oh dear 32A. It appears your coose is well and truly gooked!

Layla and McKenzie have left there too (just for the record)

Veronica Franco was there recently. Not sure if she still there tho.

She took her doodries and left

Very sad indeed. I did not see this post before. I was supposed to start this week and after various messages to 2 of the owners, all I got was the silent treatment. Maybe it was this post. Would love to know why, especially since I went out of my way to sort myself out so that I could work there. The venue is stunning and besides a few snags/teething problems, there is great potential.

I worked there on and off briefly the preceding weeks and I saw the kind of money the girls were making. Sorry for all of you naysayers, but there is money out there, with repeat business if the standards are kept to that level and the ladies are of a high standard. No comment on why the ladies left, all for various reasons, but that is between them and the venue.

Granted, there are many teething problems for a new venue and those that can't go there whether for financial reasons or whatever will put it down, but its a small venue that caters to a smaller market. This topic goes around in circles constantly and it's always the same posters that seem to comment on price etc. If it's not to your liking or budget, move on, but destroying a business like a bunch of king ding a lings on the forum is very unfair.

One thing about this forum is that guys can bitch and moan etc and relish being able to destroy businesses etc with a few words. We can't say a thing and have to bite our tongues, often bowing down to finger pointers and attacks from unhappy punters.

These are risks you take and if you're thoughtless regarding your own privacy and safety and do not not have a punting phone, sim card etc, why should we cover your butts? (see recent thread by Sharon regarding wives) Take the necessary precautions like the smarter punters.

Now before the attack starts, I have been around long enough to know that you do not send clients messages soliciting specials etc....They have been around for a few months and falling to their knees, begging forgiveness is what you expect? They explained themselves and I'm sure they will ensure they have the rights and go ahead next time they try a marketing strategy...We all live and learn, but does that warrant you trying to totally annihilate them for not bowing to you? Come on guys? Really?

This is why I like V!! Says it like it is...

Ah Ms. V. A very lucid argument in deed. I agree with you in terms of the demand for such a venue. If we can't afford it then why sley the place.

I do however not agree with the analogy that we must just accept their explanation with regards the alleged SMS. They seemed to think that it was ok just because it had an opt-out statement.

It is just not acceptable. It is my choice to use my personal phone or have a punting phone. If I use my personal phone then it is my responsibility to ensure that an audit trail of my illicit activities is removed. If not and my wife finds it then I must suffer the consequences, however an unsolicited message could create havoc at no fault of my own.