Fuck all these other things, can we just get a block function?

On 2026-07-02 10:24:15 Tigolebitties said:
On 2026-07-02 08:52:50 The_Unicorn_Chaser said: On 2026-07-01 16:50:59 ESA Forum Admin said: Dear members.

We will not be implementing a race feature. This has been addressed every time the subject has been raised.

We do not want advertisers to be categorised, filtered, or judged by race on the platform.

If an advertiser feels her race is relevant and wants to disclose it, she is free to do so in her own description. This keeps the choice with the advertiser and avoids making race a platform-controlled category.

Regards
ESA Support


Thanks Admin, super cool with that, but can I make a teensy weensy request?

Can you get your photographers or the photoshop dudes to stop hiking the lighting up so much that it's super hard to distinguish black from coloured and coloured from white at least? Yeah yeah, some have light or dark skin anyway...BUT, the point is that the shade I see online is the shade I want to see when the door opens. It's that simple.

Some guys do book across the spectrum anyway, but when you ask the lady at the counter for vanilla ice cream and get chocolate, it's a bit disappointing. On that day. Another day I might want chocolate...but budgets are tight and we'd like to get it right first up.

Please let us get a better look at who we're really booking. Just even in general terms. The editing is getting out of hand sometimes.

Thank you.

You can ask the woman you chose to contact if she's comfortable sharing her ethnicity, but that's entirely her decision. Paying for a service doesn't entitle you to every piece of personal information you want.

Photographers don't need studio lighting to make someone appear lighter or darker. Natural light, shadows, camera settings, and exposure can all affect how a person's skin tone appears in a photo. The women have repeatedly confirmed that their photos are unedited, and ESA has confirmed the same.

These women are providing a paid service, they're not products with a checklist of personal attributes for your convenience. No one should be reduced to their race or ethnicity, and no woman is obligated to disclose or advertise hers simply because you can't get laid the natural way and need to solicit sex from a stranger.

She could just tell you to go fuck yourself, because the guys who do actually end up booking her don't care.

You need to read for comprehension. I could care less what their ethnicity is, nor do I care to ask the ladies in question. Nor do I need every bit of personal information either.

The bit where you say we can't get laid the natural way etc. Are you even a real punter? What the fuck are you doing here if you're not also getting laid the paid way??

And yes, they do use photoshop. It's been confirmed to me many times by working girls themselves that they edit images, and not just for tattoo removal etc. And I've experienced the results in person.

But you seem to like trolling for some reason and I don't play that game, so sir (or m'am, because you sound more like a bitter WG than a punter), you can politely fuck off. This will be my one and only response to you on this forum.

An actual cool feature in my humble opinion would be for GMS to be able to view inactive or deactivated profiles...for the memories :)

They can remove the contact numbers/mechanisms so that its not a form of free loading

On 2026-07-02 14:17:34 The_Unicorn_Chaser said:
On 2026-07-02 10:24:15 Tigolebitties said: On 2026-07-02 08:52:50 The_Unicorn_Chaser said: On 2026-07-01 16:50:59 ESA Forum Admin said: Dear members.

We will not be implementing a race feature. This has been addressed every time the subject has been raised.

We do not want advertisers to be categorised, filtered, or judged by race on the platform.

If an advertiser feels her race is relevant and wants to disclose it, she is free to do so in her own description. This keeps the choice with the advertiser and avoids making race a platform-controlled category.

Regards
ESA Support


Thanks Admin, super cool with that, but can I make a teensy weensy request?

Can you get your photographers or the photoshop dudes to stop hiking the lighting up so much that it's super hard to distinguish black from coloured and coloured from white at least? Yeah yeah, some have light or dark skin anyway...BUT, the point is that the shade I see online is the shade I want to see when the door opens. It's that simple.

Some guys do book across the spectrum anyway, but when you ask the lady at the counter for vanilla ice cream and get chocolate, it's a bit disappointing. On that day. Another day I might want chocolate...but budgets are tight and we'd like to get it right first up.

Please let us get a better look at who we're really booking. Just even in general terms. The editing is getting out of hand sometimes.

Thank you.

You can ask the woman you chose to contact if she's comfortable sharing her ethnicity, but that's entirely her decision. Paying for a service doesn't entitle you to every piece of personal information you want.

Photographers don't need studio lighting to make someone appear lighter or darker. Natural light, shadows, camera settings, and exposure can all affect how a person's skin tone appears in a photo. The women have repeatedly confirmed that their photos are unedited, and ESA has confirmed the same.

These women are providing a paid service, they're not products with a checklist of personal attributes for your convenience. No one should be reduced to their race or ethnicity, and no woman is obligated to disclose or advertise hers simply because you can't get laid the natural way and need to solicit sex from a stranger.

She could just tell you to go fuck yourself, because the guys who do actually end up booking her don't care.


You need to read for comprehension. I could care less what their ethnicity is, nor do I care to ask the ladies in question. Nor do I need every bit of personal information either.

The bit where you say we can't get laid the natural way etc. Are you even a real punter? What the fuck are you doing here if you're not also getting laid the paid way??

And yes, they do use photoshop. It's been confirmed to me many times by working girls themselves that they edit images, and not just for tattoo removal etc. And I've experienced the results in person.

But you seem to like trolling for some reason and I don't play that game, so sir (or m'am, because you sound more like a bitter WG than a punter), you can politely fuck off. This will be my one and only response to you on this forum.

I do pay women for their services, correct. The difference is I don't question women about their ethnicity, as something clearly drew me to their profile no matter what hue their skin is. How demeaning to ask a person what ethnicity they are when you're the one approaching them on a sex site.
Another thing, you meant 'couldn't care less', you inbred idiot.

@Tigolebitties
I think you make to much of the race issue.
I punt across all races. But there days where I prefer white, and other days black ladies etc.
Exactly the same way i prefer slim/voluptuous woman. Or big or medium boobs. Etc
And that is the wonderful thing about punting. I van decide what i want today. Sometimes i prefer vanilla to chocolate ice cream, and vice versa.

On 2026-07-02 15:31:09 Fred9 said:
@Tigolebitties
I think you make to much of the race issue.
I punt across all races. But there days where I prefer white, and other days black ladies etc.
Exactly the same way i prefer slim/voluptuous woman. Or big or medium boobs. Etc
And that is the wonderful thing about punting. I van decide what i want today. Sometimes i prefer vanilla to chocolate ice cream, and vice versa.

Fred, 100% correct.

....AND ITS GONE, HAHAHA. Really pointless feature.

Of course it was and remains pointless.

Detractors will give u a thumbs down. No matter what u post.

Many won't do anything remaining "unbiased" for the "crowds " , caring what "others" may think.

And then lastly....that post about , thumbs up for ones own post. Really????

So yes.

Pointless and only the ones that crave recognition would have gone all googoo gaga at that feature. Points to vanity and playing to the crowds...a sort of insecurity?

Thumbs down?

GrIN.


:)

RB

I liked the feature especially with PG pics. Shows the ladies what works and what doesn't.

On 2026-07-14 10:49:21 Russian Bridgitte said:
Of course it was and remains pointless.

Detractors will give u a thumbs down. No matter what u post.

Many won't do anything remaining "unbiased" for the "crowds " , caring what "others" may think.

And then lastly....that post about , thumbs up for ones own post. Really????

So yes.

Pointless and only the ones that crave recognition would have gone all googoo gaga at that feature. Points to vanity and playing to the crowds...a sort of insecurity?

Thumbs down?

GrIN.


:)

RB

lol. Someone who's obnoxious posts irritate the majority of forum users most of the time, doesn't see value in a feature that gives feedback on what that ratio actually is? What a shocker.