Navigation
![]( "A member of ESA for less than a year")
![]( "A member of ESA between a year and five years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than five years, but less than 10 years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than 10 years")
![]( "Gold Member")
![]( "ESA staff met this punter in person")
![]( "A respected member of the community, with consistent helpful posts")
![]( "One of our Wicked Wendesday Winners")
![]( "Directly helps ESA in the recruitement of new advertisers")
![]( "Donated to Charity")
![]( "Is the owner/manager of a venue advertising on ESA")
![]( "Part of the ESA Photography Team")
![]( "Received the Punter Of the Year Award")
Hover mouse over icons for description
-
Re: No condom, would you?
Posted: 2026-10-02 12:08:59
Its crazy for any lady to do this. The risk is too great. Std's, pregnancy etc. Girl girls really carry the greatest risk with sex. Tgirls, ladyboys etc is another thing. Many, not all, once they know you or like you, offer without including creampies, cim etc. It is sometimes like a way of affirming trust and affection. But its like playing Russian roulette.
On 2026-10-02 11:44:58 Stunning Chanel said:
I don't offer fh without condom there is lady's that does offer but some ask to less for it like the girl you said R300 extra for without I honestly think that is really unclean
Its crazy for any lady to do this. The risk is too great. Std's, pregnancy etc. Girl girls really carry the greatest risk with sex. Tgirls, ladyboys etc is another thing. Many, not all, once they know you or like you, offer without including creampies, cim etc. It is sometimes like a way of affirming trust and affection. But its like playing Russian roulette.
-
Re: No condom, would you?
Posted: 2026-10-02 15:21:51
This logic is half-baked and you're assessing the risk incorrectly. The risk lies solely in the fact that you don't know her sexual health status, and it applies to any WG - whether they openly offer bareback or not. A WG who's strict with condoms with clients could still catch something from her bf and/or whoever else she's letting raw dog her outside the industry. Likewise a pornstar who only does it raw on the job can still be sexually healthy because they verify the sexual health of those they perform with. The uncertainty is what your condom is insuring against.
On 2026-10-01 10:09:23 Smile4U said:
Thanks, amazing how people 2nd guess what I did. I definitely did not accept the offer. I ran for the hills. I was wondering what others would do. For me, a condom is a must, but if she offers bareback, the risk is even too high with a condom.
This logic is half-baked and you're assessing the risk incorrectly. The risk lies solely in the fact that you don't know her sexual health status, and it applies to any WG - whether they openly offer bareback or not. A WG who's strict with condoms with clients could still catch something from her bf and/or whoever else she's letting raw dog her outside the industry. Likewise a pornstar who only does it raw on the job can still be sexually healthy because they verify the sexual health of those they perform with. The uncertainty is what your condom is insuring against.
Reply
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.