On 2025-10-29 10:19:26 DaveJones said:
I concur with Esabella.
I am not sure what the moderation process entails other than to detect and eliminate trolls. I would prefer reviews reflect immediately whether by a rookie or seasoned punter. What if a rookie punter only makese that single booking gets burnt badly and assumes punting is horrible so they retire?
People would never learn of what happened because that review will never be seen and a seasoned punter will then pay unnecessary school fees.

There are two places where reviews can be seen. Under a girls profile. That can only be seen by basic members and goldmembers. Or it can be seen by everyone in the public review section. Why ur reviews are not showinng is because u stil dont have street cred. You have only reviewed two girls in the time u have been on ESA.
Go to the public review section scroll to the girl u reviewed. Click on it scroll down to your review and you wil see where it says this is a a rookie review and u need to build up street cred.

Ig u worried punters wont see the review if its not under her profile. Even if a punter clicks on any review under her name ur review wil also come up. So dont worry. We wil see ur reviews

@ Mr DaveJones

Spot-on with your last comment:)

After all this is why review section were created .

Why be selective, just let all reviews flow from second posted.

Regard
A

Thanks Pumpkin.
Got you! I have been on here for a decade+ and most of my other reviews went with the wind with the loss of my original account when I attempted to retire.

My point was that even those with "no street creed" should reflect instantly. Admins can then weed out trolls from the quality of a post.

I know a lot of punters on here who don't review, dont say anything in the forums and dont attend socials and have been here longer than those assumed to have "street creed". That technical loop hole is why punters pay school fees.

On 2025-10-29 11:50:03 DaveJones said:

Admins can then weed out trolls from the quality of a post.

Wishful thinking my guy. Admin has long ago abandoned anything resembling "moderating the forum" except for clamping down on 'freeloading' (and even that only when it suits them).

A while ago someone floated the idea of making trusted forumites into moderators (a lot of internet forums do this), and I really don't see why ESA don't do it. They can even build in protections - like 2 or 3 moderators have to agree before a post is removed...