Wow this is hilarious. The fact that she is denying it makes it even more funny. Damn what a howler from her!

Proper rookie error @Drobe. Now we have to question all other reviews other than from Gold Members.

On 2025-09-23 15:20:55 ThaboM2000 said:
Proper rookie error @Drobe. Now we have to question all other reviews other than from Gold Members.

Oh brother, if you think because it's Gold members,cit can be trusted, you better think again.

This is business and ladies pay Gold membership as part of those business expenses to place themselves in the top 10. Most of those up there which you can only get from Gold membership is fake that the girls "invest" in to get there.

JP69

Well since the comment has been deleted so new punters will wonder what all the comments are about, here's the thread it's being discussed on. Basically all the reviews are fake. The wg reviewed herself with a fake punters profile and thanked herself from the fake profile and got the "thanking message" deleted.

www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php

JP69

Very odd from ESA Admin, I mean why would they delete it instead of reprimanding the lady? I thought there were rules around this

Anyway unless they come up with an explanation, its all a bit dodgy for me

Because of ESA admin's cover up of this, I will never book this lady.

I need ama popcons

I can't believe ESA is tolerating this nonsense. I mean she needs to come clean and apologize to us all about this shit. She has a hot body.. didn't even need to do it.

On 2025-09-26 08:30:55 PutaMadre said:
Very odd from ESA Admin, I mean why would they delete it instead of reprimanding the lady? I thought there were rules around this

Anyway unless they come up with an explanation, its all a bit dodgy for me

My guess is they have proof that she didn't do this. She's one of the nicest WGs in this space and don't see why she would do that when she's been here for so long and not done it before.

Those who were going to book her will still book her and those who just want to slander will have a field day even in the face of evidence of ESA deleting it which seems proof enough to me that they have a different view to what transpired.

On 2025-09-26 19:10:01 Richbillz said:
On 2025-09-26 08:30:55 PutaMadre said: Very odd from ESA Admin, I mean why would they delete it instead of reprimanding the lady? I thought there were rules around this

Anyway unless they come up with an explanation, its all a bit dodgy for me

My guess is they have proof that she didn't do this. She's one of the nicest WGs in this space and don't see why she would do that when she's been here for so long and not done it before.

Those who were going to book her will still book her and those who just want to slander will have a field day even in the face of evidence of ESA deleting it which seems proof enough to me that they have a different view to what transpired.

Hardly a valid argument. There's are wgs on this site posting fake reviews for all of those years. Just look at the highest rated wgs or longest top 10 running wgs and who those reviewsers are. Being around a while doesn't say much, especially with sonfew reviews and none of them from any credible punters.

As far as proof to ESA. It's easy for wgs to pick one simp punter to contact ESA and say it's him and he made an error. That has happened numerous times before as well. Some brownie points or a freebie or a little extra something added to the session and or in many cases just a "knight in shining armour saving a damsel in distress" complex and it's an easy call for these guys to make a little phone call or send a little message saying it's them.

JP69