One of the most professional responses from a Service Provider I have read in a long long time.

Addressing all issues , with a bit of personal flavour which is quite acceptable giving substance to her response.

I love her encouragement to all ladies of bigger size.


www.esa.co.za/escorts/viewEscort.php

BUT...

Here's me playing the devils advocate and, I have mentioned this before...

The ONLY reviewer who has got it right to date is Harry_b

He always STIPULATES IN HIS REVIEWS, he does not mark looks as they are subjective....and thus the 5/5...
I suppose because punters will come and read and the first thing they go to is LOOKS and then the shenanigans.

Is it body shaming when a punter gives less than a 5?
Because for me 5 is perfection and a frightening idea to live upto.

Being comfortable in ones imperfections is awesome. Both women and men have them . We are human after all.
It is sexy.
It is human.
It is being comfortable with self.

No matter a round ass or a flat ass. thick legs or slim legs. A size 38D or 32A bra. A younger or an older. A woman who has given birth to babies and thus a mummy tummy as opposed to those who still have to go through childbirth.



Match sex appeal, an appealing attitude, professionalism , a service to be revisited and recommended, stay away from cloak and dagger games...and you are a winner.

YOU WILL have the bestest of gents knocking on your door.

This is a cruel industry in many respects. And the Service Providers are champions in my eyes.

Possibly that is why the review system is "flawed" because gentlemen prefer not to "hurt" a woman's "feelings" and open the floodgates to the haters questioning "why not a perfect 5????"


Imagine the review system being a "HelloPeter" (and no, not freeloading. It aint a competition site) sort.
Is that customer/ consumer review platform more credible than esa reviews? ...because people blurt everything and anything out.



And yes I know....are they comparable?

RB.

I was reading that this morning.
The review itself for me was fine, the next reply bothers me though.
I think on the review points i would say it should be more towards is it as advertised. Face is difficult if not shown, so you might have an idea in your head to what you would like her to look like and might be disappointed in reality. She might still be beautiful but you prefer a long face vs round face, small nose vs pointy. Even eye brows can play a big part. So there one should be very careful with marks given.
Body on the other hand, i feel should be based on actual vs photo's. You get a pretty good idea of size and shape on the profile and if you choose her from there it should be a 5 if she looks like on the profile. In not, then a reduced score and a mention that she does not look like on her profile.

Hey Out234

Your post makes sense.

But what if it is the service that makes a punter curious and he wants to experience that?...even though the pictures may not depict a preferable body type?

Should the score still be 5?

Or should the punter then state not my body type but reviews on her service had me visiting and thus a lower score acceptable?

Giving a 5 is possibly why many punters have complained that their brother punters must be blind because what they expected a 5 to be was nowhere close to what they experienced.

I say the review system is flawed in many many ways and puts SP's on the backfoot and punters expectant.

Ps. A woman will always photograph her best side and it is the photographers job to do so too. Is that not the point of advertising.

But ...are we not human after all and when have humans known to agree overall.

:)

RB.

Dear RB.

I get what you are saying, and yes we can debate it all day long.
I think the mark out of 5 might even be confused with 5 star or 3 star grading, and not seen as a mark towards a %.
Lets say it was possible to give a %, how many of the 5/5 would be a 100%? I think a lot of the 5's would end up at 85-90%.

Then you also have the problem that the review is done by men .
Ask the same guy to rate a woman when he is browsing the purple pages, vs sitting naked with a hard on and nuts at 3 bar vs the day after said lady has drained him dry. And i am sure the results will differ.

I personally dont really look at the marks given for body, because that is the only thing being judged that is on full display, maybe i am like a todler, if i dont like the pictures i dont read. And when i read the reviews i am interested in the unseen, face and service.
There is so many variables on the body, that no 2 men will judge the same, so i go with what i see.
Leave the hands and feet.
Body type. Skinny, sexy, hourglass, curvy.
Legs, long, short, skinny, athletic, muscular.
Hips
Tummy
Neck- long, short, thin ext.
Boobs- big, small, med. full, perky or hanging like ripe fruit.
Nipples, areola ext.
Then the forbidden fruit.
So yes, if you look at that will there be a perfect 5/5? No, but will that stop me, hell no. As long as the pictures match reality and i made my choice i should be happy.

So yes, use your words, math is not for everyone and it can be interpreted in 100 different ways.

Luckily tastes differ, and it makes life interesting. Everybody have something to offer, you just need to find what you are looking for.

And also, is the hottest 35 year old as hot as the hottest 21 year old?
Just too many variables. Is she a 5 for her age, or a 5 over all the girls on the site?

On 2025-09-09 10:03:45 Russian Bridgitte said:
One of the most professional responses from a Service Provider I have read in a long long time.

Addressing all issues , with a bit of personal flavour which is quite acceptable giving substance to her response.

I love her encouragement to all ladies of bigger size.


www.esa.co.za/escorts/viewEscort.php

BUT...

Here's me playing the devils advocate and, I have mentioned this before...

The ONLY reviewer who has got it right to date is Harry_b

He always STIPULATES IN HIS REVIEWS, he does not mark looks as they are subjective....and thus the 5/5...
I suppose because punters will come and read and the first thing they go to is LOOKS and then the shenanigans.

Is it body shaming when a punter gives less than a 5?
Because for me 5 is perfection and a frightening idea to live upto.

Being comfortable in ones imperfections is awesome. Both women and men have them . We are human after all.
It is sexy.
It is human.
It is being comfortable with self.

No matter a round ass or a flat ass. thick legs or slim legs. A size 38D or 32A bra. A younger or an older. A woman who has given birth to babies and thus a mummy tummy as opposed to those who still have to go through childbirth.



Match sex appeal, an appealing attitude, professionalism , a service to be revisited and recommended, stay away from cloak and dagger games...and you are a winner.

YOU WILL have the bestest of gents knocking on your door.

This is a cruel industry in many respects. And the Service Providers are champions in my eyes.

Possibly that is why the review system is "flawed" because gentlemen prefer not to "hurt" a woman's "feelings" and open the floodgates to the haters questioning "why not a perfect 5????"


Imagine the review system being a "HelloPeter" (and no, not freeloading. It aint a competition site) sort.
Is that customer/ consumer review platform more credible than esa reviews? ...because people blurt everything and anything out.



And yes I know....are they comparable?

RB.

RB, I need your help writing a review.

I recently saw a gorgeous lady with an excellent body but a small wrinkled pouch of a mummy tummy.

I would see her again if it wasn't for the terrible accommodation and her high price - her service is excellent.

But I want to be fair in how I review her and use the Harry-B model and say something like:

"Rating her body is subjective. Everything is gorgeous though she has a small wrinkly mummy tummy." I think clients should now. But also I want to be fair to lady and not upset her. Am I gong to be ripped apart if I rate her body 3 or 4?

Let's start like this....

" He was definitely not an Adonis sort, nor one of those metrosexual guys all polished and well mannered.
He had a DAD BOD of note and sexappeal oozing from every pore.... maybe the pics a little deceiving .
His interaction on the forum, bio and reviews intrigued me. I wanted to experience what this man had to offer.

Dad bod and all...a most fantastic session had. Bla bla blaaaaaa........
5 given for looks and body shape as subjective and thus I never rate."

And now to address the words
"Dad bod.." was it body shaming? Was it meant to make him feel less worthy?
Are most men not walking around with Dad bods?
The ladies buy into the hype the men have created about " body shape" and " looks" all thanks to social media and AI generated women....and because women are more competitive in that respect than men, they feel body shamed.

Fuck that.

Women. Never ever buy into the fickleness of society because a woman who knows who she is flab, cellulite, mummy tummies , saggy boobies, you name it, there is alway an interested party.
AND imagining that everybody shall find you their cup of tea is actually quite narcissistic and egotistical.
And this applies in life in general.as well as in the industry of fuckery.

Now back to you PortaBuctcher.

Playing dumb doesn't suit you as perfection does not exist...I'm any aspect, from the written word to action to whatnot...as I said, us humans...what a bastardly bitchy bunch we are.

One can only strive to be mindfully as honest as possible and hope the person on the other end is emotionally mature and knows exactly where it comes from i.e. if done with integrity.

Oh. And PS. Being a mum to two of the most beautiful humans on this fine earth, like you are a child of your mum ( I hope she thinks of you as a beautiful human too), I carry the caesearian scar with pride as do my slightly wobbly breasts as both my beautiful children were breastfed and when I was lactating, my fuck, my tits we a 38DD...heavy heavy jugs!!


Hope I have managed to touch on most things "perfectly"

:)

RB.

Thankyou RB for your words or wisdom.

You are correct and I am enlightened as well as the possessor or a "daddy bod", possibly even a grandpapa bod.

I consider my daddy tummy a long haul investment and my saggy scrotum - hanging there like a wrinkled shaved rate - as one of my more noticeable features dangling down just above my knees. (other less apeeling including the occasional hammerroid).

It is my most unfortunate feature, precluding me wearing Afrikans shortly shorts - I remember the day I was driving through Sandton in my Bakkie with one huge testicall poking out until my wife politely pointed it out.

Lucky I tucked it back in before visiting Trumps in Sandton City.

Now those dangling balls, PortaButcher, are quite a drawcord ...a session of tie and tease.


This is how the review would read...

" a jester, the courts jester, the one proclaiming not to be a troll no more, pulled his pants down and out flopped his flaccid ding dong, and balls so mighty fine...a hanging invitation for some tie and tease. Flaccid became a thing of the past , the scrotum puffed up into a sac full.
Proudly did stand the court jester and proclaim
" how mighty fine am i!" Leaning slightly forward tryna catch a glimpse of the tip of his shaftiness protruding ever so little from under his stately paunchiness.


Did i enjoy my session?
My fuck!
Of course I did!
Would i entertain a saggy scrotum that looked like a shaved rat, again?
Without a second thought!!!

Review score ...5/5 given for looks and body shape as subjective and thus I never rate."

:)

RB.

On 2025-09-10 22:58:08 Russian Bridgitte said:
Now those dangling balls, PortaButcher, are quite a drawcord ...a session of tie and tease.


This is how the review would read...

" a jester, the courts jester, the one proclaiming not to be a troll no more, pulled his pants down and out flopped his flaccid ding dong, and balls so mighty fine...a hanging invitation for some tie and tease. Flaccid became a thing of the past , the scrotum puffed up into a sac full.
Proudly did stand the court jester and proclaim
" how mighty fine am i!" Leaning slightly forward tryna catch a glimpse of the tip of his shaftiness protruding ever so little from under his stately paunchiness.


Did i enjoy my session?
My fuck!
Of course I did!
Would i entertain a saggy scrotum that looked like a shaved rat, again?
Without a second thought!!!

Review score ...5/5 given for looks and body shape as subjective and thus I never rate."

:)

RB.

OH, RB you are the stretch matron of this forum with all the stripes on your Epaulettes. I am still a bit scared.