No feedback from esa on this. Would like to know if Shakira did vote for herself or not.

Gentleman this has taken a lot longer than expected, we looked at a total of 10 variables I'm not going to list them here as knowing what we look for will help people cheat or try to cheat.

Of the current reviews posted for SexyShakira I find no evidence that any have come from the several devices SexyShakira uses to post on the ESA web site.

An incident occurred in the past where SexyShakira shared he complementary gold membership with her punter clients and one such punter tried to write a review from the username SexyShakira it was obvious as to what she was doing so we reviewed all complementary gold memberships to service providers due to SexyShakira's actions and found the problem to be wide spread. SexyShakira's actions caused us to totally suspend giving service providers gold member access as it was abused by many who received it. All current service providers who have gold membership have paid for it.

Further the attempted review was voided and removed. At the time when this occurred there was no system in place to exclude ladies from the top 10, James has since built such a system so ladies who do not wish to be part of the top 10 could be excluded or cheats or attempted cheats could be excluded.

SexyShakira has of this post been added to the attempted cheater list so she will be excluded from the top 10 for attempting to cheat in the past.

We built a system which monitors if concurrent logins come from the same username at the same time and caught many people sharing their usernames and banned many. We received very many "why was I banned" emails, we replied with, "you know why" and many banned users worked out how they where banned and stopped this practise.

Kind regards
ESA SUPPORT

Thank you ESA. Helping us more and more to make a discerning choice! JJ

Thanks for the explanation esa. for once i thought I was the only crazy one noticing this things