We need her intellect.

On 2026-03-07 18:37:09 Minime V10.1 said:
On 2026-03-07 14:18:18 R2D4 said:
LMAO, this idiot is not evening

Evening....evening? Either you had cum from one of your buddies in your eye, or you've swallowed so much that your brain stopped working?

Anyway...your posts are boring and not original. You sound stupid.

It was an autocorrect issue, i meant to type "even".

I apologise for the delayed reply, i was busy fucking a real woman, something you obviously cant do any more ;P

You still seem butthurt about your girlfriend getting schooled repeatedly by me, a temporary solution (to your butthurt) would be to take RBs fingers out your butt, that should give you some temporary relief.

On 2026-03-07 14:21:11 R2D4 said:


She wrote a whole essay about taking time off the forum and a few days later she is back already and people take her seriously!? lol...today its this fantasy and tomorrow its another.

And you call me the simp of the lady whom this thread seems to be about. I didn't even know she's gone and you aware of her posts. Hmmmm ... feels like we have a stalker here ...

____

On the other hand, one must admire the lady. Best marketing I've ever seen. Even without an active AD she's is still getting traction (free advertising) from her detractors. That is just genius. Wonder how ESA is going to rewrite their freeloading policy.

Totally agree with J_J

"love me or hate me, it's still an obsession" as they say

On 2026-03-08 12:28:50 J_J said:
On 2026-03-07 14:21:11

And you call me the simp of the lady whom this thread seems to be about. I didn't even know she's gone and you aware of her posts. Hmmmm ... feels like we have a stalker here ...

Nice cap, its very obvious that she was not posting for a few days as threads were not being derailed and there was some peace on the forum. A forum member posted on this thread that she made a post about her hiatus, so you just need to be able to read.

Hmmm, sounds like you are still a gay idiot.

It's always fascinating how quickly some men resort to calling another man "gay" the moment he admits he has tastes, kinks, or a woman who actually knows how to push his buttons.

From a psychological standpoint, that reaction is almost textbook.

When a man is comfortable with his own desires, he stops performing masculinity for the approval of other men. And that tends to make insecure people uncomfortable, because their identity still depends on group validation and crude dominance games.

Masculinity is not a performance.

It's closer to structural gravity than social theatre.

Gravity doesn't shout.
It doesn't insult.
It doesn't panic when something different appears.

Gravity simply holds its centre.

A man who knows what he likes --- whether that's a certain type of woman, a certain dynamic, or a particular kink --- isn't losing masculinity. He's demonstrating something most people never develop: self-ownership.

Human sexuality has always existed on a spectrum of curiosity, play, dominance, submission, exploration, and imagination. Anyone who has read even a little anthropology or psychology understands this.

What's more interesting is how some men still think masculinity is proven by shouting sexual insults at other men on an internet forum.

That isn't masculinity.

That's adolescence.

Real confidence doesn't need to police another man's bedroom.

If a man has found a woman who understands his desires, teases his mind, and shares that chemistry with him, that's not something to ridicule.

That's actually one of the more honest forms of connection two adults can have.

The irony is that the louder someone shouts "gay" as an insult, the more it reveals how fragile their own understanding of masculinity really is.

Because a secure man doesn't feel threatened by another man's desires.

He simply focuses on living his own life well.

And if we're being honest, the real difference you see in threads like this is simple:

Some men are still competing for approval.

Others have already stepped outside that game.

masculinity is not defined by conformity to other men's expectations. Masculinity is defined by self-possession , knowing who you are, what you enjoy, and not needing permission from the crowd to live it.

Throughout history, the strongest men were not the ones policing each other's sexuality in crude forum insults. They were the ones confident enough in themselves that another man's desires posed no threat to them at all.

And if someone finds a woman who understands their tastes, teases their imagination, and shares that chemistry?

That's not something to mock.

That's simply two consenting adults exploring connection in their own way --- something most people secretly hope to find.

So perhaps instead of trying to shame someone for being open about desire, the more interesting question is:

Why does another person's sexuality make some people so uncomfortable?

Confidence doesn't need insults.

Confidence simply lets people live.

We are humans, we cannot please everybody around us. We are not chocolate or coffee or currency notes or salary credit sms, that mere mention will delight the other person.

I made avery casual remark, with no prejudice to anyone, about her absence.

The ones that do not like her, jumped in first, very critically explaining why and what and how.

There is generally, at all workplaces, a colleague that is not ususally liked by the majority. But the day that colleague is absent, those are the ones who talk about it, not the ones that like or are neutral.

Fellow punters have gone as far and ESAs freeloading policy amendment!!!! Is it really of that much importance???? Stalking was also brought in for no reason.

Introspect fellow punters, about where to spend your energy and the brain's usefulness.

Isn't ignoring someone the best insult? We are bright enough to know it, but not-so-bright to implement.

Interesting reading