I'm seeing quite a few malicious reviews where punters complain about the WG not 'feeling' it.

I think punters should responsibility for their part in creating a good experience for the WG too.
Yes we pay for a service/fantasy and with that comes a level of expectation
But it is not their fault if they are just aren't feeling you in session.
Think about how you show up!

"But it is not their fault if they are just aren't feeling you in session."

Brother u cant be serious. This aint a match making dating show, its a service that they provide for a fee. So unless u show up filthy, drunk or just as a complete dickhead, she must at least pretend to 'feel u' and give u the service u paid for

Not feeling it and not feeling you are two distinct things.

I don't go to a booking expecting the lady to "feel me", I'm not delusional.

I go there (not rude nor with questionable hygiene) and pay for a service. If the lady is not feeling up to it for whatever reason, she must be express herself before we proceed and I'll gladly leave and take my cash to a lady who can provide the service.

Perhaps also point out these malicious reviews so that we can also weigh in.

On 2026-02-18 15:52:23 Troy89 said:
I'm seeing quite a few malicious reviews where punters complain about the WG not 'feeling' it.

I think punters should responsibility for their part in creating a good experience for the WG too.
Yes we pay for a service/fantasy and with that comes a level of expectation
But it is not their fault if they are just aren't feeling you in session.
Think about how you show up!

Oh Troy..."Catching Feelings" is the title and somehow you still missed the plot.

You're in there writing like you're the captain of the Emotional Support Squad. "Punters need to think about how they show up." What nonsense - is this a TED Talk or a booking?

Let me get this straight. We're now responsible for curating her emotional journey too? Are we paying for a session or co-hosting a wellness retreat?

You sound less like a punter and more like a cheerleader with pom-poms:

"Come on guys! Let's bring good vibes! Let's manifest connection! Let's make sure she feels validated!"

Bro... be serious.

You even commented in a reply to a review "so Pandora's box is smelly..." in another breath - and you're out here lecturing grown men about accountability and emotional presence? So which is it? Are we responsible for the "energy," or are we supposed to light incense and sage in the room too?

No one is asking for soulmate energy. No one is asking for violins and eye contact that heals childhood trauma. But if the service is rushed, mechanical and colder than airport lounge coffee, we're allowed to call it what it is.

This isn't about "her not feeling you." This is about effort. Professionalism. Basic engagement. If I'm paying for an experience and it feels like she's mentally meal-prepping for the next booking, that's not me failing to "show up." That's poor service.

You're out here defending "vibes" like you're on payroll.

Punter's aren't there to provide emotional aftercare for someone clock-watching. We pay for a service, not to audition for boyfriend of the month.

Troy, guy...you didn't catch feelings.

You caught Stockholm Syndrome.

I'm with Ras on this one. A service provider that enters this industry needs to be comfortable to entertain different gents of all types. Obviously basic things like hygiene all good.

It unfortunately can't be on the basis of whether you find the gent attractive or not. Well, in fairness, it can be but you'd just be losing out on the income.

On 2026-02-18 18:05:04 Coastal_Suit said:
You even commented in a reply to a review "so Pandora's box is smelly..." in another breath - and you're out here lecturing grown men about accountability and emotional presence? So which is it? Are we responsible for the "energy," or are we supposed to light incense and sage in the room too?

He said what? The jokes write themselves on here.

Gents, we are all bastards if we are honest with ourselves.
Despite that fact, we can can still treat SP's as ladies and act like gentlemen ourselves.

Sex without consent is rape. Nothing more to say. Respect the limitations as imposed by the SP's.

I agree with your title just not the content of your post as several guys have shown how you are wrong.

Maliciousness to me would be guys having the time of their lives with a WG then either:
catch genuine feelings that are not reciprocated

feel they are familiar or believe that they are familiar with the lady and start pushing boundaries requesting things the lady does not offer.

That's when the tantrums begin and the malicious reviews follow, you can see it in the ladies profiles too, those reviews stick out like a sore thumb in terms of consistency

On 2026-02-18 19:19:20 Inquisitive1 said:

Sex without consent is rape. Nothing more to say. Respect the limitations as imposed by the SP's.

I really have no idea how u got here

On 2026-02-18 19:19:20 Inquisitive1 said:

Sex without consent is rape. Nothing more to say. Respect the limitations as imposed by the SP's.

What the FUCK are you on about. It's your bedtime old man you've clearly lost it